Olympiad
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:25 am
Olympiad
I was surprised to hear Matthew Sadler mention today during the Gashimov memorial commentary (on the excellent Chess 24 website) that he was still waiting to find out whether he was going to be selected from the England team for the Olympiad.
Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
(As I write this I do also recall Peter Svidler mentioning a few days ago in the same commentary that he had yet to hear regarding his participation in the Russian team so it clearly is not unusual for a federation not to have selected its team by now.)
Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
(As I write this I do also recall Peter Svidler mentioning a few days ago in the same commentary that he had yet to hear regarding his participation in the Russian team so it clearly is not unusual for a federation not to have selected its team by now.)
-
- Posts: 3559
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Olympiad
Unless your terms of employment specify a different notice period, you need only give 4 weeks notice of your intention to take 2 weeks leave, so your employer ought to be able to cope with that. Of course, the later you leave it, the greater the risk of your employer having valid grounds for objecting (e.g. other people have already booked leave at the same time you want it).Matthew Peat wrote:Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Olympiad
I think Ian is assuming an adversarial relationship with one's employer which not everyone has.Ian Thompson wrote:Unless your terms of employment specify a different notice period, you need only give 4 weeks notice of your intention to take 2 weeks leave, so your employer ought to be able to cope with that. Of course, the later you leave it, the greater the risk of your employer having valid grounds for objecting (e.g. other people have already booked leave at the same time you want it).Matthew Peat wrote:Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Olympiad
My understanding is that the top 6 (Adams, Short, McShane, Sadler, Howell, Gawain) are all available; if so then the selectors certainly have something to think about this time Arguably only Adams' place is completely obvious, assuming that Short will be politicking.Matthew Peat wrote:I was surprised to hear Matthew Sadler mention today during the Gashimov memorial commentary (on the excellent Chess 24 website) that he was still waiting to find out whether he was going to be selected from the England team for the Olympiad.
Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
(As I write this I do also recall Peter Svidler mentioning a few days ago in the same commentary that he had yet to hear regarding his participation in the Russian team so it clearly is not unusual for a federation not to have selected its team by now.)
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Olympiad
I suspect that players had been asked about their availability but until the overspend on the international budget was approved at the ECF finance meeting earlier this month then it wasn't known if the strongest team could be sent.
The current International Selection Committee comprises:
Opens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
Womens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
The current International Selection Committee comprises:
Opens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
Womens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Olympiad
Why that order? Since the number of reserves was reduced to one, having a team member with commitments at meetings and the GA has become very difficult. England is not the only team to face this problem.Jonathan Rogers wrote: My understanding is that the top 6 (Adams, Short, McShane, Sadler, Howell, Gawain) are all available; if so then the selectors certainly have something to think about this time) Arguably only Adams' place is completely obvious, assuming that Short will be politicking.
If McShane's services can be obtained, I fail to see why his selection is not completely obvious.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Olympiad
Do you happen to know (roughly) when the teams will be selected, and if later, announced?LawrenceCooper wrote:I suspect that players had been asked about their availability but until the overspend on the international budget was approved at the ECF finance meeting earlier this month then it wasn't known if the strongest team could be sent.
The current International Selection Committee comprises:
Opens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
Womens: David Openshaw (Chairman), Jonathan Parker, Jonathan Speelman
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Olympiad
Not completely obvious because he has underperformed for England in the past and his general form has dipped since he returned to full-time work. The performance at the last classical London Chess Classic, where he finished second last, beating only Gawain, points to the significant difference between the Luke on sabbatical who was even competing for first in the second and third editions of the LCC and Tal memorial, and the Luke who is back at work.NickFaulks wrote:Why that order? Since the number of reserves was reduced to one, having a team member with commitments at meetings and the GA has become very difficult. England is not the only team to face this problem.Jonathan Rogers wrote: My understanding is that the top 6 (Adams, Short, McShane, Sadler, Howell, Gawain) are all available; if so then the selectors certainly have something to think about this time) Arguably only Adams' place is completely obvious, assuming that Short will be politicking.
If McShane's services can be obtained, I fail to see why his selection is not completely obvious.
Of course you can still make a very good argument for including him. No problem. But I stick to only Adams being completely obvious. There is, after all, a very good case for each of the others too - in fact each of them has excelled more than one for England in the past whereas I don't think that Luke ever has. (Sadler 's performances in the mid to late 1990s evoke particularly strong memories).
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Olympiad
The same issue has arisen in respect of arbiter appointments. Approximately 160 arbiters will be needed. So far exactly one has been officially chosen: the Chief Arbiter will be Takis Nikolopoulos of Greece.Matthew Peat wrote:Given that the Olympiad is scheduled to start in approximately 3 months, isn't this leaving things a bit late? I know my workplace would have an issue if I tried to book 2 weeks leave with less than 3 months notice.
At the weekend I attended a workshop for International Arbiters in Brussels. Several (other) prospective Olympiad arbiters were present, some of them candidates for senior positions. More than one said that the uncertainty was making things tricky in relation to their day day jobs.
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Olympiad
Current ratings areJonathan Rogers wrote: Of course you can still make a very good argument for including him. No problem. But I stick to only Adams being completely obvious. There is, after all, a very good case for each of the others too - in fact each of them has excelled more than one for England in the past whereas I don't think that Luke ever has. (Sadler 's performances in the mid to late 1990s evoke particularly strong memories).
Code: Select all
1 Adams, Michael 2753
2 McShane, Luke J 2674
3 Short, Nigel D 2661
4 Howell, David W L 2654
5 Jones, Gawain C B 2650
6 Sadler, Matthew D 2649
Code: Select all
7 Pert, Nicholas 2552
8 Hebden, Mark L 2545
9 Haslinger, Stewart G 2544
David Howell is still at University, is he not? So that's three full time players and three part time players to choose from.
With only 25 Elo points separating them, that's equivalent to saying that 2 to 6 are of almost equal strength. If you applied 4NCL rules, you would field them in any order that appealed to you.
I don't know the availability of the female players. The corresponding ranking list is
1 Hunt, Harriet V 2438
2 Houska, Jovanka 2410
3 Ciuksyte, Dagne 2338
4 Lalic, Susan K 2260
5 Corke, Anya S 2255
6 Sarakauskiene, Zivile 2176
7 Chevannes, Sabrina L 2158
8 Jackson, Sheila 2144
9 Atkins, Rita 2141
10 Maroroa, Sue 2131
Number 6 is a new name to me, whilst number 9 used to be Mrs Hennigan.
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Olympiad
Number 6 is the sister of number 3. Both play for Guildford in 4NCL.
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Olympiad
I'd like to think that our selectors will be bold enough to recommend Akshaya Kalaiyalahan. Why wait?Roger de Coverly wrote: ....
I don't know the availability of the female players. The corresponding ranking list is
1 Hunt, Harriet V 2438
2 Houska, Jovanka 2410
3 Ciuksyte, Dagne 2338
4 Lalic, Susan K 2260
5 Corke, Anya S 2255
6 Sarakauskiene, Zivile 2176
7 Chevannes, Sabrina L 2158
8 Jackson, Sheila 2144
9 Atkins, Rita 2141
10 Maroroa, Sue 2131
Number 6 is a new name to me, whilst number 9 used to be Mrs Hennigan.
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:15 pm
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Olympiad
Afternoon All hope your all enjoying the sun today.Jonathan Rogers wrote:
I'd like to think that our selectors will be bold enough to recommend Akshaya Kalaiyalahan. Why wait?
Maria Wang i like to see go she a very good chess player
Well i must get back to the melon plants.
when you are successful many losers bark at you.
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Olympiad
Yes maybe they can do better
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:15 pm
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Olympiad
Her sister Anna is also a useful player.Have you ever watched them play? I have at the european juniors both of them always put in 100 per cent effort and would give any chess player a very good game.I remember Anna dad using a pair of binoculars to watch the games of his children.Jonathan Rogers wrote:Yes maybe they can do better
Well i hope your enjoying this lovely weather today
Last edited by Peter D Williams on Thu May 01, 2014 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
when you are successful many losers bark at you.