Post
by Alistair Campbell » Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:03 pm
One problem of a club going into abeyance is there is a disincentive to reform if the club has to start again at the bottom level.
There is a story (possibly not completely true) that Strathclyde University CC started in Division 6 of the Glasgow League, won 5 successive promotions before winning Division 1 in 1981 and then promptly disbanding. I note a successor club was back in Division 6 about 5 years later. With the decline of the number of divisions in league chess this is less of a problem.
Edinburgh University still compete in the Edinburgh league (although this isn't in England...). In fact, they won the Premier Division 3 years ago (and, amusingly, are listed merely as "University"). One in the eye for Heriot-Watt, Napier (and, indeed, QMU).
The only other Scottish University currently with a league team is St Andrews in the Tayside and Fife league.
There was a "Scottish Universities Cup" about 4 years ago, with representatives of 7 unis, but that seems to have been a one-off. Glasgow University Union won the Richardson Cup in the late 60s/early 70s, but disappeared years ago, and of course Wandering Dragons started off life as the Stirling University C team.
I note the comment about teachers' strikes above. There is a theory that the lack of school chess clubs in those days led to a "missing generation" of players, which has continued to have a deleterious effect as the missing cohort has matured (if a missing cohort can mature?) Such players would first have been the up-and-coming juniors, then the backbone of the club, then, crucially, taken their turn at sharing the organisation burden as the older generations found career, family and other commitments taking up more of their time. Their absence has accelerated the decline of club chess and ultimately caused clubs to fold.