Isn't there frequently a disconnect between workforce on the shop-floor and management, or fans on the terracing and the board of directors? The reality of the market, or league or parliament may lead to greater pragmatism of the participants.NickFaulks wrote:If the three strands of the Labour Party are the leadership, the PLP and the members, then it is clear that the PLP is at odds with the other two. Why is it so clear, as accepted by the entire mainstream media, that the PLP is the only one of the three in step?
In this case, would the PLP not be considered to have a better idea of what constitutes effective parliamentary tactics, good leadership, and electoral success?