2016 Olympiad - Baku

The very latest International round up of English news.
User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:20 am

The USA have won their match and with it the Olympiad.

[LATER EDIT: actually this was not quite as done and dusted as I thought.]
Last edited by JustinHorton on Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Alasdair MacLeod
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:43 pm

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Alasdair MacLeod » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:23 am

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Jones has drawn. Difficult to follow Short's game as the knight has turned into a king and the real Black king has donned a cloak of invisibility. Adams looks to have won. Am refusing to watch board 2. Too stressful.
Not as stressful as sitting next to game like it and my teammate is winning...

But yeah, 2 minutes left each with only 18 moves played is a bit ridiculous, no-one I know would dare do something like that....oh hang on a minute...

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:25 am

But really, the last 10 moves in about one minute. I know David has lots of experience of this, but I wish Nigel had a way to press for a win.

(I have no idea who you are thinking of Alasdair... :D )

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:34 am

Looks like David might have blown this one.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:34 am

Ah, Howell is lost now. :cry:

Just going to be 2-2. The players in contention for board medals and with big rating advantages, blew it, only drawing their games. Is that a fair (if brutal) assessment? Or should we be kinder about this result?

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:47 am

Ngel has drawn, so that's a bit of a disappointing finish (though not as disappointing as Ukraine's finish is likely to be I suppose).
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:50 am

Harikrishna has drawn with Carlsen, demonstrating for the second time this tournament that he knows how to draw king and two pawns on the kingside against king and three.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

IanCalvert
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:59 pm

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by IanCalvert » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:02 pm

I think 16/22 in the Open is really good and England finished above the Netherlands.

Does anyone think England could have done significantly better than Top 10 (approx.)? Analogies with England football not allowed!

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:09 pm

The results against China and Azerbaijan were excellent. Balanced out by the drawn matches against Iran and Peru.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:09 pm

All four games still going on on the top board of the Women's Olympiad. Would Russia winning give them the title?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:28 pm

(This is looking less plausible than it did a few minutes ago, as Goryachkina's position has gone the shape of a pear.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Angus French
Posts: 2199
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Angus French » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:32 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:The results against China and Azerbaijan were excellent. Balanced out by the drawn matches against Iran and Peru.
... and the loss to the Netherlands. Suspect on rating performances England were slightly below par.

Alan Walton
Posts: 1453
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:33 pm
Location: Oldham

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Alan Walton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:37 pm

On first inspection it looks like David had a bit of a nightmare; but actually 3 of his 4 losses came against opponents who seemed to be on fire with 2800+ performances (Kovalyov, Mamedov and Cori); it proves that there are fine margins in this competition

Paul Dargan
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 11:23 pm

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by Paul Dargan » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:40 pm

Far from convinved that a 2.5 - 1.5 win for USA locks-up the Gold .. they're probably a favourite but 3.5 - 0.5 for ukraine plus their previous unique opponents doing well ... There can be big swings in Team SB scores in an 11 round event.

Paul

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10481
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: 2016 Olympiad - Baku

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:44 pm

Yes, I thought it was done and dusted but it appears it's not so clear and that the Germany-Estonia match (where two Estonians are hanging onto possible draws) may be of some relevance.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Post Reply