Congratulations to Richard Bates and Lorin D'Costa who were joint winners on 9/11
http://chess-results.com/tnr247829.aspx ... ENG&wi=821
2016 British Open Rapidplay
-
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:16 pm
- Location: NW4 4UY
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
Did anyone in the FIDE Open or Major lose because of the illegal move rule?
Adam Raoof IA, IO
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
-
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:52 pm
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
2 players in the Open - don't know about the Major.
Is there a reason for the question?
Is there a reason for the question?
-
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:16 pm
- Location: NW4 4UY
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
only that a lot of players will have taken part in the event regularly but this is the first year it has been FIDE rated (with the baggage that comes with it) - which can be a shockAlex McFarlane wrote:2 players in the Open - don't know about the Major.
Is there a reason for the question?
certain players in my rapid events have taken to playing on in lost positions in the hope that the opponent will make an illegal move - and some have taken to setting their opponent traps in order to encourage them to do so, such as leaving their king en prise... not the intention of the rule, but certainly one of the unintended consequences.
Adam Raoof IA, IO
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
-
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:52 pm
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
Certainly not the case here.
I only saw one game where I thought the player should definitely have resigned earlier and in that game leaving the king in check was not really an option.
There was another where I feared the player was not going to exchange his promoted pawn but he did, just more slowly than I would expect in the time remaining.
I only saw one game where I thought the player should definitely have resigned earlier and in that game leaving the king in check was not really an option.
There was another where I feared the player was not going to exchange his promoted pawn but he did, just more slowly than I would expect in the time remaining.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
It will only make a difference if the arbiters and organisers have chosen not to apply (some of) the Laws when the event was not FIDE rated.Adam Raoof wrote:...only that a lot of players will have taken part in the event regularly but this is the first year it has been FIDE rated (with the baggage that comes with it) - which can be a shock
I would be surprised if the British Rapidplay has not been conducted in accordance with the FIDE Laws of Chess for at least the last fifteen years.
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:22 pm
- Location: Wakefield
Re: 2016 British Open Rapidplay
The 'illegal move loses' rule had been enforced in previous years, I was a beneficiary when my opponent ignored a check when I had 1 second left with a knight against a lot of pieces. Normally I would have resigned but this was the end of a hectic time scramble where I'd automatically kept bashing out moves whilst blundering lots of material.
Happily the tournament has switched to increments so at least games are decided on the board rather than by who can punch the clock the fastest.
Happily the tournament has switched to increments so at least games are decided on the board rather than by who can punch the clock the fastest.