Arafat Gambit
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Arafat Gambit
It goes 1.d4, Nf6 2.e4. I don't need to be told that it's dubious, but has anyone heard it called by this name?
Also works against the Alekhine.
Also works against the Alekhine.
Last edited by NickFaulks on Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Arafat Gambit
Was it by any chance played by a Palestinian at an Olympiad?
A major drawback of the opening is that Black can avoid the critical 2 ... Nxe4 by playing 2 ... d6. I imagine that that would be more likely after 1. d4, Nf6; 2. e4 than after 1. e4, Nf6; 2. d4.
A major drawback of the opening is that Black can avoid the critical 2 ... Nxe4 by playing 2 ... d6. I imagine that that would be more likely after 1. d4, Nf6; 2. e4 than after 1. e4, Nf6; 2. d4.
-
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
Is anyone really turning down that juicy, free, central pawn?
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
Yes, and his family think it should officially ( whatever that means ) be named after him. Nobody else seems to have claimed it.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:32 pmWas it by any chance played by a Palestinian at an Olympiad?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
Don't openings get named simply by common useage? Creating a page on Wikipedia, calling it the Arafat Gambit would be a good start..
-
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
It is also known as The Omega Gambit, Reynolds Gambit, Bo Gambit
National Master Robert Reynolds, Grandmaster Hellers, Grandmaster Nick DeFirmian, Master Tim McGrew have also played this gambit.
http://web.archive.org/web/201210141447 ... tPart1.htm
National Master Robert Reynolds, Grandmaster Hellers, Grandmaster Nick DeFirmian, Master Tim McGrew have also played this gambit.
http://web.archive.org/web/201210141447 ... tPart1.htm
-
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Under Cover
Re: Arafat Gambit
As Nick mentioned. 1.d4, Nf6 2.e4 is the Omega Gambit.
Apparently 2....Nxe4 3. is the Arafat Variation.
"Is anyone really turning down that juicy, free, central pawn?"
It has cost two opening tempi.
You have an undefended Knight on the board.
You have accepted the responsibility of holding onto a pawn.
You are out of your KID/Nimzo Indian book on move 2.
If you lose to this you will be the butt of jokes from your colleagues.
If you win they will say 'big deal, he gave you a pawn for nothing.'
Best to take the pawn then sac the Knight on f2.
Apparently 2....Nxe4 3. is the Arafat Variation.
"Is anyone really turning down that juicy, free, central pawn?"
It has cost two opening tempi.
You have an undefended Knight on the board.
You have accepted the responsibility of holding onto a pawn.
You are out of your KID/Nimzo Indian book on move 2.
If you lose to this you will be the butt of jokes from your colleagues.
If you win they will say 'big deal, he gave you a pawn for nothing.'
Best to take the pawn then sac the Knight on f2.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:35 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
I did run into 1. Nf3 e5 (followed by 2. Nxe5 Nc6 3. Nxc6 dxc6) in a Rapid game.
No idea if it has a name, but it's like this gambit, but played by Black!
No idea if it has a name, but it's like this gambit, but played by Black!
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
There's also 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nxe5 Nc6 which is sufficiently "respectable" to have been played by the late John Littlewood against Owen Hindle at Hastings. It's safest to just play 4. Nxc6 and play a game where Black has activity and development, but probably not enough for a pawn. For a madhouse there's 4. Qh5 g6 5. Nxg6John Hickman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:18 pmNo idea if it has a name, but it's like this gambit, but played by Black!
-
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
1.Nf3 g5!! is the Herrstrom Gambit
Your opponent simply played a reverse Omega. Old hat nowadays - it's long since been analysed out to a draw.
Your opponent simply played a reverse Omega. Old hat nowadays - it's long since been analysed out to a draw.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
I played this as Black in the last round of a tournament in 1996. The game continued 4.Nxc6 draw agreed. My opponent got his third IM norm and I got my first FIDE rating.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Arafat Gambit
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Arafat Gambit
I think its pushing it a bit to call that a gambit.
-
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Arafat Gambit
I think the Arafat Gambit should be met by the Gollum Heights Rejoinder
1 d4 Nf6 2 e4 Nxe4 3 f3 Qh4+
1 d4 Nf6 2 e4 Nxe4 3 f3 Qh4+
-
- Posts: 5250
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Arafat Gambit
What, the Latvian? There are several lines where Black gives up material long term.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)