GRENKE Classic

The very latest International round up of English news.
User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

GRENKE Classic

Post by JustinHorton » Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:10 pm

Notable among other things for the unprecedented gap in rating between its strongest and weakest participants, the tournament sees them meet in the first round. And as I write (move 28) it is not going to form.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5205
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sat Apr 20, 2019 6:05 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:10 pm
And as I write (move 28) it is not going to form.
Maybe rather more so now......
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

David Robertson

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by David Robertson » Sat Apr 20, 2019 9:30 pm

I think it's reckless, even cynical, to pitch Keymer into this tournament. If he holds his ground, fair enough; I'll be wrong then. But I'm not expecting to be wrong. What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger? Not in chess, it doesn't. It kills you

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5205
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sat Apr 20, 2019 10:24 pm

Play the rest of the tournament like he has today (despite the result) and he could yet do better "than expected".

Of course an example of what you suggest was Nigel Short, London 1980.

In the long term, did that help or hinder him?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Richard Bates
Posts: 3338
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Richard Bates » Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 am

David Robertson wrote:
Sat Apr 20, 2019 9:30 pm
I think it's reckless, even cynical, to pitch Keymer into this tournament. If he holds his ground, fair enough; I'll be wrong then. But I'm not expecting to be wrong. What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger? Not in chess, it doesn't. It kills you
Who are you accusing of being reckless/cynical though? He qualified as of right, not by invitation. So if it’s a mistake it’s his own mistake (or whoever manages what he plays in if he is “managed”)

David Robertson

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by David Robertson » Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:25 pm

Richard Bates wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 am
Who are you accusing of being reckless/cynical though? He qualified as of right, not by invitation. So if it’s a mistake it’s his own mistake (or whoever manages what he plays in if he is “managed”)
Fair point. I'd forgotten he won last year's Open, a remarkable achievement in itself.

Still, my apprehension holds. He faces a tougher challenge than Short (1980), given he meets the reigning WC, a former WC, a WC finalist, and two/three other outstanding players of their generation. Hope he holds it together

Nigel Short
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:14 am

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Nigel Short » Sun Apr 21, 2019 4:30 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Sat Apr 20, 2019 10:24 pm
Play the rest of the tournament like he has today (despite the result) and he could yet do better "than expected".

Of course an example of what you suggest was Nigel Short, London 1980.

In the long term, did that help or hinder him?
Hinder. Without a doubt.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5205
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sun Apr 21, 2019 6:28 pm

I suspected as much, but interesting to hear it from the horse's mouth as it were!
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4640
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 pm

Carlsen in his vintage 2011-4 style today. Who else wins like that?! Or has ever won like that at the top level, with any semblance of frequency?

David Robertson

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by David Robertson » Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:13 pm

Jonathan Rogers wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 pm
Carlsen in his vintage 2011-4 style today. Who else wins like that?! Or has ever won like that at the top level, with any semblance of frequency?
Simply remarkable. Close to inimitable. I can imagine how Vallejo Pons feels tonight - why carry on? go do something else with your life, something you're better at! :shock:

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5205
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:15 pm

Jonathan Rogers wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 pm
Carlsen in his vintage 2011-4 style today. Who else wins like that?! Or has ever won like that at the top level, with any semblance of frequency?
Fischer in his "invincible" period was capable of it, maybe Alekhine in his equally insultingly dominant period circa 1930-31.

But yeah, its a bit of a struggle to come up with parallels.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 7173
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by LawrenceCooper » Mon Apr 22, 2019 6:00 am

David Robertson wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:13 pm
Jonathan Rogers wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 pm
Carlsen in his vintage 2011-4 style today. Who else wins like that?! Or has ever won like that at the top level, with any semblance of frequency?
Simply remarkable. Close to inimitable. I can imagine how Vallejo Pons feels tonight - why carry on? go do something else with your life, something you're better at! :shock:
A nice stalemate trick in a line that could have happened is included in the following report: https://www.chess.com/news/view/2019-gr ... kDpfUtM3l8

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 8806
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Mon Apr 22, 2019 3:05 pm

LawrenceCooper wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 6:00 am
David Robertson wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 9:13 pm
Jonathan Rogers wrote:
Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:00 pm
Carlsen in his vintage 2011-4 style today. Who else wins like that?! Or has ever won like that at the top level, with any semblance of frequency?
Simply remarkable. Close to inimitable. I can imagine how Vallejo Pons feels tonight - why carry on? go do something else with your life, something you're better at! :shock:
A nice stalemate trick in a line that could have happened is included in the following report: https://www.chess.com/news/view/2019-gr ... kDpfUtM3l8
Another bit from that report says:

"White should have gone for the endgame 48. Rxg3 Bxg3 49. Kxg3 which is a theoretical draw."

Wonder why Vallejo Pons didn't go down that line - is the theory of these very rare endgames too obscure even for top GMs?

I think the relevant material balances are:

RNvNB
RNvNN
RNvBB
RBvNB (same colour bishops)
RBvNB (opposite colour bishops)
RBvNN
RBvBB

Has anyone dug up the tablebase results and how often these sort of endgames occur?

[It has been a while since I looked up a tablebase position online - has that become more difficult now? Some sites that previously allowed you to enter a position don't seem to be around any more, and I saw some references to 'Nalimov probing code' and lots of sites require registration, such as this one for the admittedly large Lomonosov tablebases: http://tb7.chessok.com/]

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21301
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:41 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 3:05 pm

It has been a while since I looked up a tablebase position online - has that become more difficult now?
There's an App for Android phones. It's called Lomonosov Tablebases and has the 7 man positions.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: GRENKE Classic

Post by JustinHorton » Mon Apr 22, 2019 6:34 pm

A tragedy for Keymer today.

The computers (after White's 46th) reckon Carlsen has just a small advantage against Anand. I will be amazed if he doesn't win, as the position is practically designed for Carlsen (and although Anand has played very well, not quite so designed for an older player to defend for hours).
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com