Piece values

Technical questions regarding Openings, Middlegames, Endings etc.
Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 2967
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Piece values

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Fri Jun 28, 2019 10:23 am

"(including, of course, why the chess king is to be valued at 2 notional pawns!)"

I always thought it was mobility.

User avatar
Joey Stewart
Posts: 1084
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: All Of Them
Contact:

Re: Piece values

Post by Joey Stewart » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:39 pm

John McKenna wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:18 pm
We all know that the interrogation will produce the following answer -

8 (pawns) + 6 (2 knights) + 7 (2 bishops) + 10 (2 rooks) + 9 (queen) + 2 (king) = 42!
We need an "upvote" feature for posts like this. Good one
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.

John McKenna
Posts: 3722
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Piece values

Post by John McKenna » Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:49 pm

Thanks, Joey.

However, others would then want a 'thumbs down' button.

Best if we leave thumbs twiddling...
Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Fri Jun 28, 2019 10:23 am
"(including, of course, why the chess king is to be valued at 2 notional pawns!)"

I always thought it was mobility.

And I always thought it was a lack of nobility.
To find a for(u)m that accommodates the mess, that is the task of the artist now. (Samuel Beckett)

User avatar
Michael Farthing
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
Location: Morecambe, Europe

Re: Piece values

Post by Michael Farthing » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:28 am

I always thought there was something fundamentally wrong with the Game.

John McKenna
Posts: 3722
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Piece values

Post by John McKenna » Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:01 pm

There's nothing about a flawed masterpiece that can't be attributed to its creator(s).
To find a for(u)m that accommodates the mess, that is the task of the artist now. (Samuel Beckett)

Post Reply