A "book review" by James Pratt
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:37 am
A "book review" by James Pratt
Here is a passage from page 123 of Hans Renette's McFarland book on Louis Paulsen:
That is fine, but this is what appears in a "book review" by James Pratt (https://britishchessnews.com/2019/10/23 ... ns-renette):
The date is wrong (1880, not 1857), the quote is garbled, and, above all, the passage is said by James Pratt to concern Paulsen, instead of Anderssen.
James Pratt calls the author "Rennette."
- O.G. Urcan
That is fine, but this is what appears in a "book review" by James Pratt (https://britishchessnews.com/2019/10/23 ... ns-renette):
The date is wrong (1880, not 1857), the quote is garbled, and, above all, the passage is said by James Pratt to concern Paulsen, instead of Anderssen.
James Pratt calls the author "Rennette."
- O.G. Urcan
-
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
I'm no historian but Anderssen, according to Wikipedia, died in March 1879 which would rule out a description of an 1880 encounter with him.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 8806
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
The account was written by MacDonnell in 1880, describing his encounter with Anderssen in 1857 (23 years earlier).
Putting the review to one side, what do people think of the book by Renette on Paulsen? £60 is not within my budget, but it does sound good.
Putting the review to one side, what do people think of the book by Renette on Paulsen? £60 is not within my budget, but it does sound good.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:37 am
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
Roger Lancaster's strange post seems to be based on a simple misreading of my post.
Hans Renette's book is excellent.
Hans Renette's book is excellent.
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
I have corrected on screen and with thanks to all these experts.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:37 am
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
Still on the subject of James Pratt's "review":
The Paulsen book weighs 1.3 kilos, and not "about 5 kilos." It was published in Spring 2019, and not on "30 Nov. 2018." It has 441 pages, and not "274."
The Paulsen book weighs 1.3 kilos, and not "about 5 kilos." It was published in Spring 2019, and not on "30 Nov. 2018." It has 441 pages, and not "274."
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
I have corrected on screen and thanked Olimpiu personally at the end.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:59 pm
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
Let me add to the remarks about this review that Owen finished a sound 2 points behind Paulsen at the London 1862 tournament, while I'm also very curious to find out about Paulsen's contributions to the Leningrad Dutch! I must have overlooked those .
Thanks for the positive review!
Hans
Thanks for the positive review!
Hans
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: A "book review" by James Pratt
John Upham is threatening never to give me any more review copies. I tried emigrating but my luggage was 5 kilos over weight, so I got stopped in customs while they searched for contraband, Leningrad Dutches, I fear. I had in mind x ... Nh6 but Harding (1976), a book I have always loved, is silent. However, be in no doubt, Richard James is doing most of the historical stuff now. Sorry Hans and yes
James
James