Pedants United
-
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
Susie Dent has preached to us on many occasions that language changes and of course we accept that - sometimes there are improvements.
I find some errors entertaining, e.g. people using "prestigious" to mean "with prestige", when it actually means "tricky" as it comes from "prestidigitate".
I did complain to one senior manager at work when he had delivered a talk where we would have worn out half a dozen pens if we had been playing "buzzword bingo". I said, "This is an international company - it is really unfair on the people who have English as a second language for you to talk like that. Will any of them understand what you just said? Most of the English wouldn't have done either." He got a bit cross. He was talking about "functional silos" and "blue-sky thinking" and other tripe. In fairness, he probably didn't know what he was talking about either.
And another bugbear, someone attending a meeting is not an "attendee" - that would be the meeting room itself. If anything, the person would be an "attender".
I find some errors entertaining, e.g. people using "prestigious" to mean "with prestige", when it actually means "tricky" as it comes from "prestidigitate".
I did complain to one senior manager at work when he had delivered a talk where we would have worn out half a dozen pens if we had been playing "buzzword bingo". I said, "This is an international company - it is really unfair on the people who have English as a second language for you to talk like that. Will any of them understand what you just said? Most of the English wouldn't have done either." He got a bit cross. He was talking about "functional silos" and "blue-sky thinking" and other tripe. In fairness, he probably didn't know what he was talking about either.
And another bugbear, someone attending a meeting is not an "attendee" - that would be the meeting room itself. If anything, the person would be an "attender".
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Pedants United
I sense a bright future for this thread.
And who can say it's not more interesting than chess, when the only chess happening at the moment is skittles?
And who can say it's not more interesting than chess, when the only chess happening at the moment is skittles?
-
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: Pedants United
I'm enthusiastic about operationalizing it end to end, but only if Kevin does the ideation and wireframes the strategic staircase
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Pedants United
Well that isn't quite true tbh (though it still is at the very highest level)Nick Ivell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2020 6:11 pmI sense a bright future for this thread.
And who can say it's not more interesting than chess, when the only chess happening at the moment is skittles?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:54 pm
Re: Pedants United
It niggles me when people (especially in writing) use "prevaricate" as a synonym for "procrastinate". "Snuck" instead of "sneaked" has snuck/sneaked its way into everyday use, also to my annoyance.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
I think you are straining the bounds of pedantry here, Kevin. My Chambers dictionary does include for 'prestigious' the definitions 'deceitful, juggling, using legerdemain', but followed by the telling bracket (obs.) for obsolete. However, in witty Chambers style, it does partly define 'prestige' as a name or reputation to conjure with, while admitting that its origin was a conjuring trick or illusion (obs.).Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2020 5:36 pmSusie Dent has preached to us on many occasions that language changes and of course we accept that - sometimes there are improvements.
I find some errors entertaining, e.g. people using "prestigious" to mean "with prestige", when it actually means "tricky" as it comes from "prestidigitate"......
.....And another bugbear, someone attending a meeting is not an "attendee" - that would be the meeting room itself. If anything, the person would be an "attender".
The same dictionary has nothing about 'attendee' being the meeting room. It has the same meeting as 'attender'.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
Nice bit of jargon, Paul. We've come a long way since a work meeting I attended about forty years ago. There were raised eyebrows and an intake of breath when a colleague said he was going to action something. Quite acceptable now, though I wouldn't use it myself.Paul Cooksey wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2020 6:29 pmI'm enthusiastic about operationalizing it end to end, but only if Kevin does the ideation and wireframes the strategic staircase
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
Well, as is well-noted in contemporary linguistics, implementing standardization is an arduous task which no one can oversee, hence the reason when I see references to Fowler -he who lies at the end of prescriptivism- it raises an eyebrow. The only point of mention from that lot, starting with Bishop Louth that is, they were so hard-line yet there is not one single point they never could agree on -not one!
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:37 pm
Re: Pedants United
I'm not sure it's pedantry to be irritated by new expressions. The ones that get me are where people use words that actually mean something else.
If I hear that someone has refuted an allegation I expect to hear that he has disproved it, not that he simply denies it.
If an arbiter appears disinterested, I would have expected nothing less, but it is very likely the intention was to tell me he appeared uninterested.
And top of the list, if someone tells me he is good, I'm inclined to think that's a judgement that others should make, and irrelevant when I was asking about the state of his health.
If I hear that someone has refuted an allegation I expect to hear that he has disproved it, not that he simply denies it.
If an arbiter appears disinterested, I would have expected nothing less, but it is very likely the intention was to tell me he appeared uninterested.
And top of the list, if someone tells me he is good, I'm inclined to think that's a judgement that others should make, and irrelevant when I was asking about the state of his health.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
Pedant/pedantic/pedantry are pejorative terms referring to the making of over-fine distinctions. My Chambers scathingly defines a pedant as an 'over-educated person who parades his or her knowledge'. I hope, therefore, that the title of this thread is seen as tongue-in-cheek, for none of us would want to be described thus. I certainly don't see myself as a smug know-all and would be delighted and amused if an error were discovered in my posts here.David Williams wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 10:52 amI'm not sure it's pedantry to be irritated by new expressions. The ones that get me are where people use words that actually mean something else.
If I hear that someone has refuted an allegation I expect to hear that he has disproved it, not that he simply denies it.
If an arbiter appears disinterested, I would have expected nothing less, but it is very likely the intention was to tell me he appeared uninterested.
And top of the list, if someone tells me he is good, I'm inclined to think that's a judgement that others should make, and irrelevant when I was asking about the state of his health.
I think chess players have a natural desire for accuracy and a sensitivity to blunders, so the forum is a convenient place to moan and discuss, without sneering at any individuals for whom the use of language matters not one jot. However, I think there are legitimate targets, particularly journalists for whom language is the soul of their profession.
So, David, one man's pedant is another man's fellow traveller in the nurture of linguistic clarity. I am fully in agreement with the three examples you gave. I can't pinpoint when 'I'm good, thanks' began. Although I wouldn't say it myself, I am happy to tolerate it and certainly wouldn't initiate an investigation into its precise meaning. (Had to be careful there - my predictive text phone came up with 'it's'!).
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
The bottom line is, to borrow one from David Crystal, 'language does not belong to anyone, it isn't owned'. Standardization has been in play for centuries but all that does is streamline the increase in vocabulary and alterations in grammar and syntax. American and British English are more different from each other than you might think, but who is to say we are more correct than the Americans?
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Pedants United
I asked for a refund from WH Smith's for selling news papers without supplements. No chess, suduko, and other weekend pleasures.
Shafted for 7 Susie Dent.
Shafted for 7 Susie Dent.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
Standard American and British English are 'correct' in their own way. Most of us have probably seen simple comparative vocabulary lists - sidewalk/pavement, trunk/boot etc. - and the spelling differences - center/centre, labor/labour.MJMcCready wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 1:58 pmThe bottom line is, to borrow one from David Crystal, 'language does not belong to anyone, it isn't owned'. Standardization has been in play for centuries but all that does is streamline the increase in vocabulary and alterations in grammar and syntax. American and British English are more different from each other than you might think, but who is to say we are more correct than the Americans?
Personal preference prevails when it comes to certain expressions. 'Hospitalised' was frowned upon at one time here as an American import, but I rather liked its conciseness in place of 'was admitted to hospital'. Conversely I thought 'burglarised' was inferior to our 'burgled'.
I spent two terms at an American school in what would now be called my gap year. In English class the word 'fecund' came up and the teacher asked us its meaning. 'Fertile, sir,' say I. Blank look from teacher. 'Fertile, sir!' Penny drops. 'Ah, you mean FURTLE! We suffer from the lack of a common language.'
By the way, don't ask an American to knock you up in the morning. It suggests a rather intimate encounter.
Last edited by Paul Habershon on Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Pedants United
My pet irritation is those (surprisingly many) who mix up discreet and discrete.
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Pedants United
In fact, it irritates me so much, I inadvertently posted the same message twice - now deleted.