Due to his almost film star levels of popularity, Tal was freer to say what he thought than many of his contemporaries in the pre-Gorby USSR. Even so, there is speculation he was pressed into signing that infamous post-Korchnoi defection letter (something he soon regretted)Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:57 pmI haven't seen it yet, but It's got Ray Keene in it and I imagine it's critical of Communism and the Soviet Union.
I'm wondering if it had the telling interview with Tal. The interview was in English but a "translator" was present. So Tal would listen to the question in English and reply presumably in Russian. The translator would then give an English translation presumably the idea being to make sure Tal didn't say anything incorrect. At one stage Tal took exception to the translator's English and corrected him.
Closing Gambit
-
- Posts: 5251
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Closing Gambit
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:53 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
I really enjoyed it. Definitely worth people watching and seeing what they think. It's also available on Amazon's platform.
The archive footage is fascinating. Whenever Karpov won a game, his entourage would organise a party. Seeing "independent" match organiser Campomanes not only in attendance at the first such event, but also toasting Karpov and expressing his hope for the five more victories that Karpov needed, is somewhat jaw-dropping. (Incidentally, Karpov was presented with a cake which had the final position on it after every game that he won!)
As the film explains, in some ways Karpov - Korchnoi 1978 was an even bigger deal for the Soviet authorities than Fischer - Spassky. Having lost the title once to an American, losing it to a defector would have been even worse. This was an era where chess had a symbolic power (for good or ill) that it never will again.
The interviews with Kasparov, Karpov, Keene, Sosonko, Stean, Short, King et al are all very interesting and well thought out. I was quite moved by Karpov's reflections on the reconciliation (of sorts) that ultimately came about between himself and Korchnoi.
For me this was an enjoyable watch and an important contribution, in terms of preserving and sharing some pivotal moments in the history of the game.
The archive footage is fascinating. Whenever Karpov won a game, his entourage would organise a party. Seeing "independent" match organiser Campomanes not only in attendance at the first such event, but also toasting Karpov and expressing his hope for the five more victories that Karpov needed, is somewhat jaw-dropping. (Incidentally, Karpov was presented with a cake which had the final position on it after every game that he won!)
As the film explains, in some ways Karpov - Korchnoi 1978 was an even bigger deal for the Soviet authorities than Fischer - Spassky. Having lost the title once to an American, losing it to a defector would have been even worse. This was an era where chess had a symbolic power (for good or ill) that it never will again.
The interviews with Kasparov, Karpov, Keene, Sosonko, Stean, Short, King et al are all very interesting and well thought out. I was quite moved by Karpov's reflections on the reconciliation (of sorts) that ultimately came about between himself and Korchnoi.
For me this was an enjoyable watch and an important contribution, in terms of preserving and sharing some pivotal moments in the history of the game.
Ben Graff
Author of 'Checkmate! Great Champions And Epic Matches From A Timeless Game' 'The Greenbecker Gambit' and 'Find Another Place'
Author of 'Checkmate! Great Champions And Epic Matches From A Timeless Game' 'The Greenbecker Gambit' and 'Find Another Place'
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Closing Gambit
They are very definitely not all very interesting and well thought out.
One of the many annoyances of the film (and one I didnt really want to go through again, because by God it is tiresome to say so) to anybody with the slightest interest in proper historical standards is that it entirely invents a sub-plot by which Korchnoi was going to be assassinated if he won, something for which actual archive evidence is absent. Quite a few of these "very interesting" interviews are dedicated to discussing this non-existent plot, which is among the reasons why the last part of the film drags like somebody tied an anvil to the back of your car. (It's far from the only thing which is annoying about the interviews - I recall wondering on a number of occasions why somebody's opinion had been sought in the first place, or why it hadn't just been cut.)
I mean i guess if we're operating on the usual guidelines of "this is about chess, so anything will do" then fill your boots, but perhaps better to fill them with something more substantial.
I also seem to remember that the use of music is incredibly annoying.
(Searching for "soundtrack" I discover that my previous verdict was "outstandingly pedestrian". Closing Gambit would be far from the only outstandingly pedestrian work on chess that I've seen praised like it was something special, a habit which is as dispiriting as it is common.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
"entirely invents a sub-plot by which Korchnoi was going to be assassinated if he won, something for which actual archive evidence is absent."
Korchnoi claimed to have evidence, but sadly he appears not to have shown it to anyone...
I doubt anyone would have been surprised if he had won and then died in mysterious circumstances. But that's more suspicion of Governments, than genuine information.
Korchnoi claimed to have evidence, but sadly he appears not to have shown it to anyone...
I doubt anyone would have been surprised if he had won and then died in mysterious circumstances. But that's more suspicion of Governments, than genuine information.
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
Like Fischer did?Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:38 pm
I doubt anyone would have been surprised if he had won and then died in mysterious circumstances.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
"Like Fischer did?"
That would not have been surprising either... but why bother? It did become clear quite quickly, that even if he started the 1975 match, he probably wouldn't have finished it. Karpov would not have been so charitable after Game 2. Also, Korchnoi was a defector - they would regard him as a traitor, much worse than a foreign opponent.
That would not have been surprising either... but why bother? It did become clear quite quickly, that even if he started the 1975 match, he probably wouldn't have finished it. Karpov would not have been so charitable after Game 2. Also, Korchnoi was a defector - they would regard him as a traitor, much worse than a foreign opponent.
-
- Posts: 5251
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Closing Gambit
Yes, personally I have always seen Karpov winning that game 32 in 1978 as maybe *the* biggest single achievement of his career. Especially given how he had collapsed previously to that, and the magnitude of what was at stake.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
There was the Korchnoi allegation that the choice of opening in that game had been leaked. It isn't known whether the Karpov team had assembled the collected writings of RDK as an attempt to predict what might come up. If they had done so they would have found the idea of .. Na6 in the Pirc transposing to a semi-Benoni mentioned in the Batsford book on the Pirc written with George Botterill.Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 3:19 pmYes, personally I have always seen Karpov winning that game 32 in 1978 as maybe *the* biggest single achievement of his career.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:53 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
I don't disagree. The film is very interesting though on Korchnoi's choice of opening in game 32. Korchnoi chose to speculate with the Pirc, when no risks, grinding chess might have improved his chances - given how exhausted Karpov was.Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 3:19 pmYes, personally I have always seen Karpov winning that game 32 in 1978 as maybe *the* biggest single achievement of his career. Especially given how he had collapsed previously to that, and the magnitude of what was at stake.
Ben Graff
Author of 'Checkmate! Great Champions And Epic Matches From A Timeless Game' 'The Greenbecker Gambit' and 'Find Another Place'
Author of 'Checkmate! Great Champions And Epic Matches From A Timeless Game' 'The Greenbecker Gambit' and 'Find Another Place'
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Closing Gambit
Well quiteJonathan Bryant wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:14 pmLike Fischer did?Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:38 pm
I doubt anyone would have been surprised if he had won and then died in mysterious circumstances.
This is the sort of question a properly inquisitive film might have asked, instead of the guff it actually came out with. It might also have discussed the question of why Korchnoi might have developed paranoid views about one of his seconds.Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 3:56 pmThere was the Korchnoi allegation that the choice of opening in that game had been leaked. It isn't known whether the Karpov team had assembled the collected writings of RDK as an attempt to predict what might come up. If they had done so they would have found the idea of .. Na6 in the Pirc transposing to a semi-Benoni mentioned in the Batsford book on the Pirc written with George Botterill.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
What was mysterious about Fischer's death? I though he died of kidney failure after many years of refusing to have a urinary tract problem properly treated.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Closing Gambit
For what it's worth I think the leaking allegation is false, but it's a lot less wild than the assassination nonsense and it's true that Ray was, in fact, cheating Korchnoi at the time, which can't have done much for the latter's state of mind. It's one of the many frustrations of the film that it has a really interesting and tragic narrative available to it, and instead it opts for the load of old cobblers at the end.
My favourite sporting event ever, that match. Deserves a lot better.
My favourite sporting event ever, that match. Deserves a lot better.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Closing Gambit
I think that that is exactly the point being made. Fischer didn't come to any harm in the aftermath of the 1972 match.John Moore wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 4:13 pmWhat was mysterious about Fischer's death? I though he died of kidney failure after many years of refusing to have a urinary tract problem properly treated.
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
Thank you, David. I wasn't paying proper attention to the thread - not the first time that's happened.
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Closing Gambit
"I wasn't paying proper attention to the thread"
Don't worry - you're obviously not alone!
Don't worry - you're obviously not alone!