Anand v Gelfand
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Seems to have worked for Boris. Surely the two bishops have value, now, even against the possibility of two connected passers.
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
yep, I don't have the security of hearing VKs opinion yet. But at the risk of looking foolish, I find it hard to believe qf3 was critical.
I'm a bit worried we are falling into the interesting opening/ dull middlegame pattern again. Although a very interesting opening and much more life than usual in the game now. So I'm trying to see the glass as half full.
I'm a bit worried we are falling into the interesting opening/ dull middlegame pattern again. Although a very interesting opening and much more life than usual in the game now. So I'm trying to see the glass as half full.
- Carl Hibbard
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
The oracle spake thusly.Carl Hibbard wrote:All safe now, draw expected shortly
I had some hope that Anand would try to press, he is a knight man. But Carl on the money so far, and however interesting the game looks, Anand and Gelfand have proved you are never more than 5 moves from a draw.
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Surely there's a bit of play left, yet?Carl Hibbard wrote:All safe now, draw expected shortly
- Carl Hibbard
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Anand v Gelfand
No, if Anand does try to press I think it is only Black with chances?Paul McKeown wrote:Surely there's a bit of play left, yet?Carl Hibbard wrote:All safe now, draw expected shortly
Also he "wants" rapid in my opinion
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Two bishops?Kramnik wrote:Definitely I choose Black, definitely
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Black should play to squeeze. Space, two bishops and silly pawn on h4.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Will Gelfand accept a draw offer? Will Anand make one?
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Centre, good squares for rooks, easy play.Paul McKeown wrote:Two bishops?Kramnik wrote:Definitely I choose Black, definitely
Kramink being very polite but lots of "I don't understand what Anand is thinking chosing this line", "decison is so strange"
"I could understand if safe, not even safe" "look for exit before is too late" "not sure a draw offer would work"
-
Matthew Turner
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Svidler saying White might be a little bit better.
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Kramink heard him, they are near each other apparently. He was amused they differed and respected the opinion, but did not agree.Matthew Turner wrote:Svidler saying White might be a little bit better.
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
"Look up, Borya!" Clock running down a little.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Anand v Gelfand
The computers give White a slight edge, should their opinion be respected here? Or are they simply saying that Black has sufficient compensation for the pawn?