Anand v Gelfand

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9308
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Alex Holowczak » Sat May 26, 2012 6:59 pm

John McKenna wrote:The whole thing has been turned on its head by Spain's TV station sending their entrant the following message - please don't win. To which their singer Pastora Soler agreed - I think it is not the moment, neither for Spain nor for Spanish public, to win Eurovision.
Having heard the quality of their recent entries, they've probably had this mantra for years! :lol:
Geoff Chandler wrote:Going to put £5.00 on the Russian Grandmothers to win it tonight.
Sweden are such strong favourites that I'm surprised the book is still open.

The results of one fan poll have Sweden winning by such a large margin that holding the actual contest is probably a waste of time!

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Sat May 26, 2012 7:08 pm

John McKenna wrote:Eurovision Song Contest, or Englelbert and the babushkas? The whole thing has been turned on its head by Spain's TV station sending their entrant the following message - please don't win. To which their singer Pastora Soler agreed - I think it is not the moment, neither for Spain nor for Spanish public, to win Eurovision. If we won, I think it would be impossible to stage the next edition because it costs so much money.
The message is clear - give us your (nil) points.
This reminds me of a recent Private Eye entry envisaging Germany playing Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Spain in the forthcoming euos and winning on (financial) penalties!

Normally it would be sacrilege to spoil a World Championship match thread with such topics, but this particular match can consider itself honoured to have a thread at all.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6323
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sat May 26, 2012 7:13 pm

Yes, things appear to have reverted to type after a misleading flurry of excitement :)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10472
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by JustinHorton » Sat May 26, 2012 7:46 pm

Monday may very well be a thriller though. (I have no basis for this statement other than the knowledge that I shall be travelling and will therefore miss it.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Ray Sayers

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Ray Sayers » Sat May 26, 2012 8:03 pm

1. Nf3 Nf6; 2. Ng1? Ng8?, 3.Nf3 Nf6, 4. Ng1? <Black attracts the attention of the Arbiter>.... :lol:

Richard James
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 pm
Location: Twickenham
Contact:

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Richard James » Sat May 26, 2012 8:25 pm

Ray Sayers wrote:1. Nf3 Nf6; 2. Ng1? Ng8?, 3.Nf3 Nf6, 4. Ng1? <Black attracts the attention of the Arbiter>.... :lol:
Ah! The Oliphant Opening!

http://www.ecforum.org.uk/viewtopic.php ... 6&start=15

User avatar
Mats Winther
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:27 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Mats Winther » Sun May 27, 2012 2:47 pm

This WCH match has given me support for my argument. Expert knowledge in chess openings, aided by computers, makes the player avoid critical lines, and instead they play amateur openings. This is bad publicity for chess. A draw in approximately 25 moves is to be expected in most games. Something must be done about the chess rules.
http://hem.passagen.se/melki9/valiantchess.htm

M. Winther

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Sun May 27, 2012 3:02 pm

Mats Winther wrote:This WCH match has given me support for my argument. Expert knowledge in chess openings, aided by computers, makes the player avoid critical lines, and instead they play amateur openings. This is bad publicity for chess. A draw in approximately 25 moves is to be expected in most games.
Well, this argument only really applies to match play. In tournament play, there's more incentive to take risks to win.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6323
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sun May 27, 2012 4:09 pm

People like Mats have to answer why that has suddenly become the case now - when it wasn't for the 2010, 2008 or 2006 WC matches (even leaving aside the question of tournaments, as Jack says) Computers weren't significantly less strong back then than they are now, if truth be told........

Its not mainly a computer thing, its a human thing. The styles of Anand and Gelfand are cancelling each other out - if anything might help here, it is lengthening the match (though as already pointed out, players might not be so conducive to that these days)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Sean Hewitt
Posts: 2193
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Sean Hewitt » Sun May 27, 2012 4:16 pm

If this match involved two of Topalov, Carlsen, Shirov, Svidler, Aronian or any number of others I doubt very much this discussion would be ongoing. The style of match is simply derived from the two players concerned.

Mick Norris
Posts: 11368
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Mick Norris » Sun May 27, 2012 7:29 pm

Well, it has just reached BBC News - I walked in the lounge 5 minutes ago to see Svidler talking about the match (Freeview channel 80)
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Mick Norris
Posts: 11368
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Mick Norris » Mon May 28, 2012 12:15 pm

Game 12 is underway
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Paul Cooksey

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Paul Cooksey » Mon May 28, 2012 12:22 pm

Kramnik in the commentary box on the official site. http://moscow2012.fide.com/en/

Mick Norris
Posts: 11368
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Mick Norris » Mon May 28, 2012 12:25 pm

Vishy varies at move 5 from Game 10

Kramnik has suggested abandoning the draw offer for the next match, playing 14 games, and having the tiebreaks at the start rather than end of the match
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Paul Cooksey

Re: Anand v Gelfand

Post by Paul Cooksey » Mon May 28, 2012 12:26 pm

Vladimir Kramnik wrote:Anand is really going for it, clearly he wants to end the match today

Post Reply