Candidates Tournament 2013

The very latest International round up of English news.
User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:05 pm

Tristan Clayton wrote:It's been good to hear everyone's experiences of visiting the Candidates tournament. I'm looking forward to seeing round 7 this weekend. Just a quick question - I can understand the rigorous body checks before being allowed in the playing hall, but is it true that mobile phones (even switched off) are not allowed?

No big deal if not (I can drop mine off at work on the way in), but forewarned is forearmed! Interesting that I could see nothing on the ticket website, or during the booking process, about this. If indeed it's true. And assuming I've not missed something obvious. Which is entirely possible.
It is true. No warning before booking, it seems, but signs in the foyer as you go in. There is a staffed cloakroom where you are asked to deposit bags, coats and mobile phones/cameras etc (similar to the one in operation at the London Chess Classic). I agree if you are not happy to deposit valuable electronics, you may be in a bind, but if you are prepared to deposit items it is no problem as far as I can tell (it has been OK for me so far). You would still be free to look round the shop and (I presume with a ticket) enter the commentary room and take photos and/or use your phone/computer there. Probably different arrangements for the press room, but I've not seen that and presumably one would need a press pass or invitation to go there.

MikeTasker
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:37 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by MikeTasker » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:37 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:I can understand the rigorous body checks before being allowed in the playing hall, but is it true that mobile phones (even switched off) are not allowed?
I think phones and valuables are kept in some sort of store box in the cloakroom, but don't lose the key as I did, as they charge £5 for a replacement :|

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:09 pm


Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:54 pm

Ivanchuk's left himself extremely low on time again. Chesscasting says he's got 12 minutes for 20 moves.

Also, Carlsen must be close to winning against Svidler. The white position is in danger of becoming very passive.

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:20 pm

Kramnik's now sacrificed a whole rook against Ivanchuk.

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:25 pm

Carlsen has beaten Svidler with black.

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:40 pm

Ivanchuk 1 minute for 13 moves - can he hang on?

John McKenna

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by John McKenna » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:47 pm

Grischuk v. Gelfand - Boris is a pawn up and Grischuk played 25.Qd1... 27.Qd1... Don't like it when he does that move - if he does it again before move 40 I'll think he may be losing.

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:57 pm

Draw between Kramnik and Ivanchuk. Lawrence Trent just described Kramnik in this tournament as like Fernando Torres - he just can't put the ball in the back of the net!

Clive Blackburn

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Clive Blackburn » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:59 pm

Eoin Devane wrote:Kramnik's now sacrificed a whole rook against Ivanchuk.
It ended in a draw, Kramnik was getting into time trouble and best he had was repetition

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6323
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:09 pm

Clive Blackburn wrote:
Eoin Devane wrote:Kramnik's now sacrificed a whole rook against Ivanchuk.
It ended in a draw, Kramnik was getting into time trouble and best he had was repetition
Thought it was Ivanchuk who was short of time (again)??

I wonder what odds you could get on Vlad drawing all his games? :lol:
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Clive Blackburn

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Clive Blackburn » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:31 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Clive Blackburn wrote:
Eoin Devane wrote:Kramnik's now sacrificed a whole rook against Ivanchuk.
It ended in a draw, Kramnik was getting into time trouble and best he had was repetition
Thought it was Ivanchuk who was short of time (again)??

I wonder what odds you could get on Vlad drawing all his games? :lol:
Well both of them were in time trouble really but Kramnik's case it was more serious.

When the draw was agreed they had played 30 moves each, Kramnik had only 1 min left on his clock and Ivanchuk had 5 mins.

Brendan O'Gorman
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Brendan O'Gorman » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:48 pm

Clive,

I think you've got this the wrong way round. Ivanchuk was the one with only one minute left. In the commentary room, Kramnik was asked why he hadn't played on given that his opponent had but a minute left. He said he would have played on if Ivanchuk had only five seconds left!

Clive Blackburn

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Clive Blackburn » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:58 pm

Brendan O'Gorman wrote:Clive,

I think you've got this the wrong way round. Ivanchuk was the one with only one minute left. In the commentary room, Kramnik was asked why he hadn't played on given that his opponent had but a minute left. He said he would have played on if Ivanchuk had only five seconds left!
Ok Brendan, in that case I am sure that you must be right. I was taking my information off chessbomb and it is possible that the clock times were wrong on there.

I have just looked at the game again on chessbomb and I can confirm that it does show the final times as 1m:02s for Kramnik and 5m:19s for Ivanchuk.

Eoin Devane
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Candidates Tournament 2013

Post by Eoin Devane » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:03 pm

Indeed it was Ivanchuk who got down to 1 minute for 13 moves (again!). Kramnik had plenty of time at that point (about 30 minutes), but when they were repeating moves he used up most of that time desperately trying to find a win. You could see on the video feed that he was shaking his head a lot - clearly he was really hoping to win that one.

Post Reply