Psychology of Chess

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Post Reply
Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 2770
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Psychology of Chess

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Mon May 13, 2019 11:47 am

As the Book Reviews section has disappeared, I'll mention it here.

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... y_of_Chess

By Fernand Gobet, described as "Professor of Decision Making and Expertise at the University of Liverpool, UK"

I didn't think that was a thing, (the job title, not the university), but a quick search showed it was. He is a proper chess player so I'm sure it's worth a read. Waterstones in Bath stocked it as well.

It's one of a series, some of the titles are pretty exotic. " The Psychology of Everything is a series of books which debunk the myths
and pseudo-science surrounding some of life’s biggest questions. " They have books on vampires, gender, driving, gardening, fashion, climate change (OK that has pseudo-science). I'll try to get around to reading them all.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 6074
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Psychology of Chess

Post by JustinHorton » Mon May 13, 2019 12:12 pm

I have a copy, it's on my summer reading list. I was recommended it by Dr Andrew McGettigan, who some forum readers may recall wrote a series of articles on the World Championship match for the London Review of Books blog.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Richard James
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 pm
Location: Twickenham
Contact:

Re: Psychology of Chess

Post by Richard James » Mon May 13, 2019 2:07 pm

Andrew McGettigan also recommended it to me. Some of us have also heard Fernand Gobet speaking at the London Chess Conference.

Here's my take on the book.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Psychology of Chess

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Mon May 13, 2019 6:38 pm

Gobet is a legit researcher. I’ve not read the book but I have read a couple of his published journal articles.

What he has to say will be worth reading. The antithesis of the bluster and bull**it approach favoured by too many chess commentators

Post Reply