An unusual illegal move

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Joey Stewart
Posts: 2172
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: All Of Them
Contact:

An unusual illegal move

Post by Joey Stewart » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:54 am

So I was playing a rapid game last night which featured a situation I have never encountered before - my opponent went for a bishop exchange, picked up both bishops, realised one needed to remain on the board but ended up putting my piece back instead of his (therefore "capturing" his own bishop).

I just let him take it back and fix it rather then getting into any sort of messy dispute, but I wondered afterwards how would that be officiated if it were to occur in a tournament situation - an illegal move maybe, or would I just get to keep the extra piece ?
Any opinions expressed will not be held to account.

MartinCarpenter
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am

Re: An unusual illegal move

Post by MartinCarpenter » Thu Sep 01, 2022 8:56 am

I guess at that point your opponent simply hasn't played a move. Their bishop is still (more or less) picked up and in their hand - people don't often do it but I can't see putting a piece you're definitely going to move down off the board while thinking as being viewed as especially serious.

Presumably they'd legally just have to complete the bishop capture?

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: An unusual illegal move

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:48 am

If a player picks up pieces of both colours, they must make a capture involving both pieces if they can legally do so.

Ian Thompson
Posts: 4253
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: Awbridge, Hampshire

Re: An unusual illegal move

Post by Ian Thompson » Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:37 pm

Joey Stewart wrote:
Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:54 am
So I was playing a rapid game last night which featured a situation I have never encountered before - my opponent went for a bishop exchange, picked up both bishops, realised one needed to remain on the board but ended up putting my piece back instead of his (therefore "capturing" his own bishop).

I just let him take it back and fix it rather then getting into any sort of messy dispute, but I wondered afterwards how would that be officiated if it were to occur in a tournament situation - an illegal move maybe, or would I just get to keep the extra piece ?
It depends on whether your opponent pressed the clock or not.

If he didn't press the clock then he hasn't played an illegal move and he can put it right. The only claim you might make is that he distracted you by what he did.

If he did press the clock then he has played an illegal move. If an arbiter sees this he should intervene and penalise the illegal move. As it's a rapidplay game, if the arbiter doesn't intervene then you can choose between making an illegal move claim yourself or continuing the game from the position on the board.

Reg Clucas
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm

Re: An unusual illegal move

Post by Reg Clucas » Fri Sep 02, 2022 1:21 pm

I had a similar incident in a Rapidplay, also with a Bishop exchange. My opponent captured my Bishop, picked up both Bishops and moved his hand to press the clock - but was in such a hurry that he dropped both Bishops back on my Bishop's square. However he continued his hand movement and pressed the clock. I therefore claimed an illegal move. What was annoying though was that when the arbiter arrived my opponent swore blind that this had not happened. I therefore found it particularly satisfying to win in the end.

Post Reply