New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Contact:

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Chris Goodall » Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:02 pm

I mean, if you want to convince me that 7...e5 is playable based on that game, there's the small matter that Shankland flattened it...
Chris Goodall, formerly known as Chris Wardle. ECF Grader for the ancient kingdom of Bernicia (or Northumberland and Durham, if you prefer).
Newcastle is not in Scotland!

John Moore
Posts: 1766
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by John Moore » Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:18 pm

Chris, I'm really not that bothered whether you are convinced or not. We will see whether more strong players (much stronger than you and me) play the idea.

I know I suggested it as an idea for club players and mainly for surprise value and you picked up on these points and I understand where you are coming from but maybe it will go further than that. I doubt that Liang played the best line against Shankland but we shall see shortly perhaps.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 18045
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:42 pm

John Moore wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:18 pm
mainly for surprise value
It surprised Seirawan certainly. As it goes against conventional wisdom, quite likely there will be players who haven't been following the US Championships who don't know about it. That said, you have to know a little bit of Caro theory to get to the start position. Someone not confident in their knowledge might not play Qb3.

Nick Burrows
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Nick Burrows » Mon Apr 30, 2018 7:06 pm

After:
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3 Nf6 6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Qb3 e5 8. h3
Na5 9. Qc2 exf4 10. hxg4 Nxg4 11. Kf1 h5

Stockfish offers white no advantage whatsoever.

Eric Gardiner
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:42 am
Location: Hull

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Eric Gardiner » Mon Apr 30, 2018 7:15 pm

It's worth pointing out that the position before 7...e5 can also arise via a London move order. In 2016, I played the Black side of a game starting: 1.d4, d5; 2.Bf4, Nf6; 3.e3, c5; 4.c3, cxd4; 5. exd4, Nc6; 6.Bd3, Bg4; 7.Qb3. I have to confess the idea of 7...e5 didn't occur to me at the time! My opponent was aware we'd transposed to a line of the Caro-Kann and mentioned this to me after the game.

User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Contact:

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Chris Goodall » Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:52 pm

John Moore wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:18 pm
We will see whether more strong players (much stronger than you and me) play the idea.
John Moore wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:18 pm
I doubt that Liang played the best line against Shankland
:? So is there any point us patzers discussing opening theory, or not? Or only when we agree with you?
Chris Goodall, formerly known as Chris Wardle. ECF Grader for the ancient kingdom of Bernicia (or Northumberland and Durham, if you prefer).
Newcastle is not in Scotland!

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 2836
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:03 pm

Chris Goodall wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:02 pm
I mean, if you want to convince me that 7...e5 is playable based on that game, there's the small matter that Shankland flattened it...
Because he was the better player, rather than any fundamental defect in that particular line?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Contact:

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Chris Goodall » Tue May 01, 2018 12:16 am

Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:03 pm
Chris Goodall wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:02 pm
I mean, if you want to convince me that 7...e5 is playable based on that game, there's the small matter that Shankland flattened it...
Because he was the better player, rather than any fundamental defect in that particular line?
What would it have looked like if Shankland had beaten Liang because of a fundamental defect in that particular line? It looks to me like the weakness of b7 and d5, the blocked bishop on f8 and the open h-file all forced Liang into castling queenside, and then Shankland attacked on the queenside and wherever Black's activity was, it wasn't in the vicinity of White's king.
Chris Goodall, formerly known as Chris Wardle. ECF Grader for the ancient kingdom of Bernicia (or Northumberland and Durham, if you prefer).
Newcastle is not in Scotland!

Phil Neatherway
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: Abingdon

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by Phil Neatherway » Tue May 01, 2018 9:59 am

After:
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3
what is the current thinking about Qc7, which prevents Bf4.

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 5038
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: New Idea for Caro-Kann players

Post by LawrenceCooper » Tue May 01, 2018 3:52 pm

Chris Goodall wrote:
Tue May 01, 2018 12:16 am
Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:03 pm
Chris Goodall wrote:
Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:02 pm
I mean, if you want to convince me that 7...e5 is playable based on that game, there's the small matter that Shankland flattened it...
Because he was the better player, rather than any fundamental defect in that particular line?
What would it have looked like if Shankland had beaten Liang because of a fundamental defect in that particular line? It looks to me like the weakness of b7 and d5, the blocked bishop on f8 and the open h-file all forced Liang into castling queenside, and then Shankland attacked on the queenside and wherever Black's activity was, it wasn't in the vicinity of White's king.
Shankland (and others) consider Na5 to be forced after h3 and exf4 to be bad.

Post Reply