David Pardoe wrote:I feared as much....is this the start of another Congress downturn.
And why did our Congress delegates not flag up this obvious risk (very loudly) when the voting took place (or maybe they too didnt get that vote). The main vote going to league based bodies who were being offered chess on the cheap...at £13. So, it was no surprise that this got through with so little challenge.
This glaring imbalance might well be addressed in some part by the introduction of OMOV, along the lines I have previously outlined.
It depends which way round you look at it. Congresses resented having to pay a levy to the ECF in exchange for membership and votes. They've got what they wanted in part anyway. Those Congresses that expect non-members to compete, such as Scottish and Welsh players, don't have to compel them to become members at a cost of £ 19 per head, but do have to charge £ 6 more than they charge ECF members to balance their budgets. In areas where MOs had been established, there is an increased cost to local club members, as previously their £ 13 MO cost included discounted entry to the local (or any) Congress whereas they now have to pay £ 19 for the same rights.
The winners on this are those who are already £ 27 members as their clubs benefit from reduced league entry fees. Everyone else, MO members, Juniors , league only players outside MO areas are the losers.
(edit) The general debate is probably better transferred to "Consequences of membership". As others suggest, whilst last year's event gained from being the British venue ( people coming to take a look), this year probably lost out. (/edit)