Not necessarily. I could receive a clearance request for a player tomorrow for the Finals Day. Their estimate might include any Congress results played since then, or League results that have been submitted for end of season grading.John Hodgson wrote:But the rule (quoted previously) referred to using results from the master list. Surely (for players without a July 2012 grade) the January 2013 grade reflects the master list and you could have used that and stayed within the existing rules?
If they're ungraded in July, graded 135 in January, but are going to be graded 142 with their January-July results, should they be eligible for the Under 140 section?
I don't think there's a right or wrong answer to that question. The rules at the moment say the player is ineligible. Others might think they should be eligible. This was a point over which there was no consensus, so I left the rule unchanged in intention, albeit the wording might have changed.