I genuinely can't see him doing it this time, with the infusion of "new blood". If he does it is likely to be on merit, though.John Moore wrote:If it's not Anand, as I suspect it will be, then it will be Caruana. The fact that Tim doesn't want to see a third Anand-Carlsen match doesn't mean that it won't happen.
2016 Candidates prediction
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Is no-one going to vote for Karjakin? Has anyone done an analysis based on recent results between all the players?
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
I've gone for Karjakin; I rather agree with Nick Faulks. From a Western point of view he seems on the wrong side of the argument, but it's not so simple on the ground I daresay. Failing that, I have a hunch for Giri, though I wonder if the next world champion will be from the generation below, given Magnus's age and current strength.
-
John McKenna
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Nakamura has got my vote.
Chessbase article about the event with Danish Grandmaster Peter Heine Nielsen on the individual candidates' chances -
http://en.chessbase.com/post/2016-fide- ... tournament
Chessbase article about the event with Danish Grandmaster Peter Heine Nielsen on the individual candidates' chances -
http://en.chessbase.com/post/2016-fide- ... tournament
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Not me. I don’t expect him to win and very much hope he won’t. I also hope Anand won’t - although for very different reasons. With Vishy, it’s because I think his chances of beating Carlsen aren’t significantly higher than mine would be. A third match would be dullsville.Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Is no-one going to vote for Karjakin?
Aronian - seems like we were talking about him becoming the challenger several cycles ago and he never did. Feels like his chance has gone.
Nakamura - I can see him ripping up the Candidates and then getting thoroughly battered by Carlsen in a way that wouldn’t happen to Caruana.
Svidler - I’d love to win but I don’t think he will.
Topalov - aint going to happen.
Giri - not this time.
The most interesting World Championship matches would be Carlsen v Nakamura or Caruana so that’s who I’d most like to win. Who will? Random guess - Nakamura. I do worry it might be Anand, though.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
No longer quite good enough at this exalted level, IMO.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Tristan McDonald
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 4:48 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Direct link to the game here: https://www.i-pools.co.uk/affiliate_joi ... 8%22%0A%7D
-
Nick Burrows
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
-
Colin Patterson
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:27 am
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
It seems unlikely to me that Anand's safety-first, solid style will win out again. Of course it's hard to dismiss him entirely. If others crash and burn, or fail to push hard, he will be lurking in the background, filling any vacuum.
Topalov makes a lot of his "been there, done it, no pressure on me any more" attitude. It means he can play without fear or trepidation, but is his form good? Can he match the stamina of the younger talents on show? I think not this time.
It's hard to know what to make of Caruana. He seems quite fearless, and could win at a canter if he can regain that Sinqfield Cup form of 2014. There is a welcome positivity coming from his camp, but did his form in 2015 suggest that the steamroller could make another appearance? Sadly not.
What about Giri? He still strikes me as a little too young and naïve in his behaviour. I think he revels in being accepted as one of the leading pack and this manifests in him being a people and media pleaser. There is a lot of respect shown for those around him and he craves it back. His next step has to be looking beyond that mindset; he must learn to shun some of the drawing lines and start believing in his great tactical skills.
Nakamura has exceptional ambition and must have felt like a caged animal, missing out on the Candidates stage in previous cycles. With the shackles removed, I can see him making a mighty push here. That extra momentum, backed by his usual dogged determination and undeniable talent at the top level, will make him hard to stop. Definitely my pick for winner here. A match with Magnus though, would be another story.
Topalov makes a lot of his "been there, done it, no pressure on me any more" attitude. It means he can play without fear or trepidation, but is his form good? Can he match the stamina of the younger talents on show? I think not this time.
It's hard to know what to make of Caruana. He seems quite fearless, and could win at a canter if he can regain that Sinqfield Cup form of 2014. There is a welcome positivity coming from his camp, but did his form in 2015 suggest that the steamroller could make another appearance? Sadly not.
What about Giri? He still strikes me as a little too young and naïve in his behaviour. I think he revels in being accepted as one of the leading pack and this manifests in him being a people and media pleaser. There is a lot of respect shown for those around him and he craves it back. His next step has to be looking beyond that mindset; he must learn to shun some of the drawing lines and start believing in his great tactical skills.
Nakamura has exceptional ambition and must have felt like a caged animal, missing out on the Candidates stage in previous cycles. With the shackles removed, I can see him making a mighty push here. That extra momentum, backed by his usual dogged determination and undeniable talent at the top level, will make him hard to stop. Definitely my pick for winner here. A match with Magnus though, would be another story.
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Here’s another prediction: Agon's "nobody can broadcast the moves but us" plan isn’t going to be successful.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
Nick Burrows
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Agon board meeting:Jonathan Bryant wrote:Here’s another prediction: Agon's "nobody can broadcast the moves but us" plan isn’t going to be successful.

-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11369
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Although in true chess tradition, money will be removed from chess and given to lawyers in the processJonathan Bryant wrote:Here’s another prediction: Agon's "nobody can broadcast the moves but us" plan isn’t going to be successful.
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Brian Towers
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:23 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
Emotions running wild with the predictions, I think.
Peter [url=https://chess24.com/en/read/news/svidler-on-his-candidates-chances]Svidler on Chess24[/url] wrote:The opinion of all the experts I’ve seen so far, however, has come down to the same thing – it’s the most unclear Candidates Tournament in recent years, in the sense that it’s impossible to name clear favourites.
Ah, but I was so much older then. I'm younger than that now.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10474
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates prediction
I do wish people wouldn't wear hats indoors.Nick Burrows wrote:Agon board meeting:Jonathan Bryant wrote:Here’s another prediction: Agon's "nobody can broadcast the moves but us" plan isn’t going to be successful.
Anyway I note Carlsen saying of Nakamura "I don’t think he’s going to win", though we might interpret that as an attempt to mess with the American gentleman's head.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."