I won't. I suppose we should be thankful that Dreamworks are prepared to take the risk that I mightJustinHorton wrote:Don't tell us any of the Kung Fu moves.Jonathan Rogers wrote:Same problem here. If this continues, I might as well take my son to see Kung Fu Panda 3.
2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
It's only speculation but it doesn't really matter, does it? Let's say there is an injunction and it was served by a Russian judge. It would be pretty stupid for any global chess sites to ignore such an injunction regardless of whether they were based elsewhere.NickFaulks wrote:Surely it depends upon the jurisdiction of the injunction. We don't know that - in fact, we don't know much.Richard Bates wrote:Not much of a legal expert, but if Agon have secured a court injunction against broadcasting then I imagine that the other sites will have no choice but to comply, pending the legality of the ban being tested in court.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
No, it would be their only proper course of action.Richard Bates wrote:It's only speculation but it doesn't really matter, does it? Let's say there is an injunction and it was served by a Russian judge. It would be pretty stupid for any global chess sites to ignore such an injunction regardless of whether they were based elsewhere.NickFaulks wrote:Surely it depends upon the jurisdiction of the injunction. We don't know that - in fact, we don't know much.Richard Bates wrote:Not much of a legal expert, but if Agon have secured a court injunction against broadcasting then I imagine that the other sites will have no choice but to comply, pending the legality of the ban being tested in court.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Angus French
- Posts: 2199
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Can't the sites say what's happening - or are they prevented from doing that?
-
Ian Thompson
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
But that wouldn't explain the lack of moves on the NRK website as they've reportedly paid a lot of money to be allowed to broadcast the games.Richard Bates wrote:Not much of a legal expert, but if Agon have secured a court injunction against broadcasting then I imagine that the other sites will have no choice but to comply ...
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Whatever the provenance of the injunction may be, they are clearly showing it two fingers. That's all I wish to know at present.Angus French wrote:Can't the sites say what's happening - or are they prevented from doing that?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
On what basis are you saying they are not complying? Sites have stopped broadcasting. It would be stupid to ignore because arguments about whether what Agon are trying to do would be irrelevant and people would end up in prison.NickFaulks wrote:Whatever the provenance of the injunction may be, they are clearly showing it two fingers. That's all I wish to know at present.Angus French wrote:Can't the sites say what's happening - or are they prevented from doing that?
-
Angus French
- Posts: 2199
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Ah, chess24 and chessbomb at least appear to have resumed broadcasting the moves.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10480
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Who has stopped broadcasting? I look at Chessbomb and ICC, they're both still standing.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
What is the Norwegian link, btw?
I wouldn't be surprised if this is the key to the whole thing, because it is probably sourcing from there that the other sites were relying upon as their defence against any ban. Agon's case is that it is not possible to source the moves other than from their site, and the Norwegian outsourcing is a massively loophole that they had initially overlooked.
I wouldn't be surprised if this is the key to the whole thing, because it is probably sourcing from there that the other sites were relying upon as their defence against any ban. Agon's case is that it is not possible to source the moves other than from their site, and the Norwegian outsourcing is a massively loophole that they had initially overlooked.
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Can't we talk about the chess instead of its broadcast?
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I must say i'm a bit confused about all this exposure the sponsors are apparently expecting. I've gone on the official site and watching the games i'm none the wiser as to who the sponsors are.
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Caruana V Giri is fascinating don't you think?
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
One game drawnMJMcCready wrote:Can't we talk about the chess instead of its broadcast?