2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Not my idea of good chess to watch or, if I could do it, to play.
Are we allowed to talk about the games after they've finished or do we have to wait for the round to finish?
Are we allowed to talk about the games after they've finished or do we have to wait for the round to finish?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I'm perfectly happy for you to talk about the games after they've finished, or even while they're in progress.
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Naka-Giri drawn. Crazy.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
That's helpful and appreciated but I was actually asking, in theory.IM Jack Rudd wrote:I'm perfectly happy for you to talk about the games after they've finished, or even while they're in progress.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I am not a lawyer, but I'm pretty certain Agon's "ban" has no legal force.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
David Smerdon was going to liveblog round four but it's not clear to me whether or not he is actually doing so.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
He's recommending that people follow the game from the nrk site, which seems to be operating again. The problem, as Geoff Chandler would point out, is that without a game score and memory of watching the games unfold, it can be difficult to make sense of the comments.JustinHorton wrote:David Smerdon was going to liveblog round four but it's not clear to me whether or not he is actually doing so.
The nrk link is http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Looks like serious blogging to me.JustinHorton wrote:David Smerdon was going to liveblog round four but it's not clear to me whether or not he is actually doing so.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11370
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Svidler draws with Aronian - that's 2 games running he has been better but not managed to convert it into a win, bit early for conclusions I know, but maybe he has missed his chance
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Topalov's given up his d6 pawn. He must have really hated his position, but I don't see how this improves it.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11370
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Karjakin beats Anand to take the sole lead
Topalov appears to have made another mistake in the run up to the time control and looks to be in trouble again - it looked to me like Caruana's plan was to wait for a mistake, and it had worked
Topalov appears to have made another mistake in the run up to the time control and looks to be in trouble again - it looked to me like Caruana's plan was to wait for a mistake, and it had worked
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
That's basically how most of the top players seem to be going - you can see from Nakumura's games vs Svidler and Giri that trying to catch people out playing principled chess isn't at all easy!
So they play some really quite slow stuff to try and make sure there's a position to use later on in the game. Or plain odd things like Karjakin did, although he did later switch back to very classical play. I guess h4 pretty much justified itself by provoking f5
So they play some really quite slow stuff to try and make sure there's a position to use later on in the game. Or plain odd things like Karjakin did, although he did later switch back to very classical play. I guess h4 pretty much justified itself by provoking f5
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
But Caruana's 41st, played quickly, looks like a big mistake. Topalov now has counterplay, at least.
Caruana thinking hard about move 42!
Caruana thinking hard about move 42!
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
What do you reckon he was thinking of? I don't understand 41. R1b5 at all.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."