You only really have to worry about bad Bishops when your opponent has a Knight. In the positions they've reached it acts as a super pawn, supporting white's pawn structure.Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Well, it looks like Aronian has a bad bishop, but there are presumably some specific features of this position that make it easy to defend (or hard for Topalov to take advantage of)
2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
-
Chris Rice
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Think Topalov's going to have to agree to a Giri shortly and they have 1/2-1/2
-
Martin Benjamin
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Best chuckle of the day so far.Chris Rice wrote:Think Topalov's going to have to agree to a Giri shortly.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
That's rubbish Roger. There are plenty of classic 'same-colour bishop' endgames with level material where the side with the bad bishop is completely lost when the pawns of the side with the bad bishop have been fixed on the square of the same colour as the bad bishop. Usually due to some zugzwang where the bishop ends up tied to defending two weak pawns and in having to move, loses one of them.Roger de Coverly wrote:You only really have to worry about bad Bishops when your opponent has a Knight.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Well, they've drawn.
Very big last round and a half for Caruana, who's gone from being all but out of it to (in my view) favourite).
Giri is White against Nakamura tomorrow and absolutely has to win if he wants to keep any chances of going to New York.
Last round, incidentally, is Karjakin v Caruana.
Very big last round and a half for Caruana, who's gone from being all but out of it to (in my view) favourite).
Giri is White against Nakamura tomorrow and absolutely has to win if he wants to keep any chances of going to New York.
Last round, incidentally, is Karjakin v Caruana.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
If they are level going into that last round, who does the tie-break favour?JustinHorton wrote: Last round, incidentally, is Karjakin v Caruana.
(The tiebreaks are applied in this order: head-to-head results, number of wins, Sonneborn-Berger score, rapid game match, blitz game match, and finally an Armageddon game. )
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
3. 7 Tie-breaks
If the top two or more players score the same points, the tie will be decided by the following criteria, in order of priority:
a) The results of the games between the players involved in the tie.
If they are still tied:
b) The total number of wins in the tournament of every player involved in the tie.
If they are still tied:
c) Sonneborn - Berger System.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Meanwhile the official site crosstable makes my head hurt. Does it actually make sense?

EDIT Chess 24 do a little better, at least in terms of being comprehensible


EDIT Chess 24 do a little better, at least in terms of being comprehensible

Last edited by JustinHorton on Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
If the second direct encounter of the two leaders is a draw and the tie break of "most losses" doesn't apply, it could come down to that.JustinHorton wrote: c) Sonneborn - Berger System.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Indeed, if they played and drew the last round now, that would be the case, wouldn't it?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
If they started the last round level and neither had lost a game, Sonneborn Berger is next in line.JustinHorton wrote:Indeed, if they played and drew the last round now, that would be the case, wouldn't it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonneborn-Berger_score
As they've both beaten Anand and Nakamura, their S-B score is also level.
Anand would mostly likely lose out on the head to head tie break, even if he does catch up.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Seems like a good moment to mention this, from 28th Feb.
NickFaulks wrote:Me too, with Karjakin as an each-way backup.Ray Sayers wrote: So I will go with the boring, predictable prediction of Caruana.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Nick Burrows
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
You da bestNickFaulks wrote:Seems like a good moment to mention this, from 28th Feb.NickFaulks wrote:Me too, with Karjakin as an each-way backup.Ray Sayers wrote: So I will go with the boring, predictable prediction of Caruana.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10478
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Roger de Coverly wrote:If they started the last round level and neither had lost a game, Sonneborn Berger is next in line.JustinHorton wrote:Indeed, if they played and drew the last round now, that would be the case, wouldn't it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonneborn-Berger_score
As they've both beaten Anand and Nakamura, their S-B score is also level. .
If there is no clear winner with the above 3 criteria, there will be a special competition between the players who still remain
tied after using the 3rd criteria (Sonneborn - Berger): after a new drawing of colors, each tied player will play two (2) tie-break games
with the other tied opponent(s). The games shall be played using the electronic clock starting with 25 minutes for each player with an
increment of 10 seconds after each move.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
This reads ambiguously to meJustinHorton wrote:3. 7 Tie-breaks
If the top two or more players score the same points, the tie will be decided by the following criteria, in order of priority:
a) The results of the games between the players involved in the tie.
If they are still tied:
b) The total number of wins in the tournament of every player involved in the tie.
If they are still tied:
c) Sonneborn - Berger System.