Batumi Olympiad

The very latest International round up of English news.
Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:48 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:44 pm
FWIW, the finishing positions for England in the Olympiads from 1976 (after the grouping system ended) to the present day are:

1976 3
1978 12
1980 6
1982 10
1984 2
1986 2
1988 2
1990 3
1992 10
1994 4
1996 4
1998 11
2000 7
2002 7
2004 30
2006 19
2008 15
2010 24
2012 17
2014 28
2016 9
2018 5
That's useful, even though I would also like to know how many of the top ten and top twenty we played on each occasion!

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 8839
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:49 pm

Ah, I get what you mean now. I'll leave you to do a relative comparison over the last 30+ years. :mrgreen:

Data from Olimpbase.

In Olympiads at least, the period from 2004 to 2014 was dire in terms of finishing positions.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21326
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Roger de Coverly » Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:54 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:44 pm
1992 10
At the time, that was considered a poor result. The reality hadn't really dawned that rather than have to cope with one Soviet Union team, which you might beat on a good day, or even outscore, there were now about half a dozen of them, all credible top 10 performers.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5251
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:08 pm

You could add the old Yugoslavia splitting up into a few decent teams as well.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 8839
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:19 pm

To answer my earlier question, 5th place at this Olympiad is the best result by the England Open team at an Olympiad since 4th place in 1996 (some 22 years ago), and the best result in all team competitions since 4th place in 2001 (some 17 years ago) in the European Teams (unless there are other team events I am forgetting).

[Sorry for focusing on the statistics of the Open team and its history here - there has been less focus on the women's team and event here, though there has been some - anyone want to take a dispassionate look at where this performance ranks for the England women's team (seeded 25th and finished 29th with a good win in the final round)? That is not even mentioning the drama that occurred in the top match in the women's event! Russia will be traumatised by that.]

[In the Open event, seven GM norms and eleven IM norms.]

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Nick Burrows » Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:26 pm

Roger - should we double the membership fee to offer Doctor Nunn a well paid 6 year contract?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21326
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Roger de Coverly » Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:30 pm

Nick Burrows wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:26 pm
Roger - should we double the membership fee to offer Doctor Nunn a well paid 6 year contract?
I'm the wrong person to ask that question of, as it remains my view that individual membership fees should be abolished with the exception of Platinum membership. The main idea is to promote participation by new or occasional players without imposing unnecessary barriers to entry.

As pointed out by the new FIDE president and one of his rivals, the FIDE model is one of financing chess by taxation, which is also the model embraced by the ECF.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10385
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Mick Norris » Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:15 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:49 pm
Ah, I get what you mean now. I'll leave you to do a relative comparison over the last 30+ years. :mrgreen:

Data from Olimpbase.

In Olympiads at least, the period from 2004 to 2014 was dire in terms of finishing positions.
Which begs the question of what changed, what is going right and what can be done to continue this

And then, to bring back to your other point, what lessons can be learned from and for the Women's team
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Nick Burrows » Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:56 pm

Mick Norris wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:15 pm
Which begs the question of what changed, what is going right and what can be done to continue this
Listening to the players take on proceedings could be revealing. Was there a true word spoken in Davids jest - has being freed from the presence of our greatest (and greatest outspoken) player increased team cohesion?

What was the influence of the prescence of the calm, knowledgeable, experienced and well liked John Nunn?

Angus French
Posts: 2153
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Angus French » Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:45 pm

I think really though our last two Olympiad performances have been par performances. As Jonathan R said somewhere above, we beat the teams who on paper were weaker than us, drew with the team we matched and lost to the more highly rated; we were also a little lucky with the draw in only facing two of the stronger sides. Collectively the players lost an ELO rating point or so... Still, the run of poor results has definitely ended.

Richard Bates
Posts: 3340
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Richard Bates » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:00 pm

Deleted
Last edited by Richard Bates on Sat Oct 06, 2018 6:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21326
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Roger de Coverly » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:13 pm

Angus French wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:45 pm
I think really though our last two Olympiad performances have been par performances.
With six players in the world top 100, regularly finishing in the top ten should be achievable.

What we are missing was seen in the match against Russia. Kramnik should have had to face his drinking pal of twenty five years ago, Adams, with teenage or early twenties superstars or potential superstars on 1 and 2. Experienced players Howell and Jones follow on 4 and 5.

David Robertson

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by David Robertson » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:16 pm

Mick Norris wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:15 pm
Which begs the question of...
what changed?

We got the luck of the draw
what is going right?
Team played well; as a unit; and to form
what can be done to continue this?
It won't, because it can't, continue

Chris Rice
Posts: 3418
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Chris Rice » Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:24 pm

Pure drama at the end in the Ju Wenjun - Kosteniuk game and Ju Wenjun gives her side of the story in a 4 minute interview to chess.com. She wasn't sure that the Kosteniuk claim was going to be turned down and even when it was she couldn't see how to win until Kosteniuk made the fatal error of moving the knight to f4.

Chris Rice
Posts: 3418
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am

Re: Batumi Olympiad

Post by Chris Rice » Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:41 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:14 am
The Chinese players diverge on move 17
Shankland was interviewed after the game and it turns out the the USA team had prepared this opening together. In the Wesley So game Shankland says that Yu Yangyi knew what he was doing but his opponent, Li Chao, did not. So in the video you will see Li Chao concentrating hard and continually looking at Yu's board to see what he played. Shankland was none too happy about this happening in such an important match.