J T Melsom wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:36 pm
What is not true about my post other than a slight insignificant debate about sequence of posts? The key questions I posed have largely gone unanswered amidst a lot of interesting but largely irrelevant verbiage. It is very much to my mind as if the original alleged racism doesn't matter. (I include the word alleged just to avoid the repetition of your somewhat tortured justification of Avrukh). And if it really is the case that it doesn't matter to members of the chess community and governing bodies then that's pretty shocking.
Nick, can you not offer some detail about attitudes within FIDE to these issues?
You thought the time sequence significant enough to raise it. If you get away with it once you are likely to repeat that kind of slip.
I still maintain that Avrukh was not being overtly racist - covertly perhaps, but just because he disagrees with Carlsson that should not make his statement racist.
And, I think it was poor form that Jon B just posted a glib - just look at this and you can see exactly what it is without need for any discussion - just agree and we can take it from there, as you are advocating.
Nick F always tells amusing anecdotes but in his last one he has lost his grip on statistical reality, in which his local and the global experiences will seldom match.