Rooks and castles
-
Paul Habershon
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Rooks and castles
Times crossword 8d Wednesday 2nd September: Church Mass arranged in heart of Kent castle for one (8). Solution: CHESSMAN
I think The Times uses Collins dictionary so, fair enough, 'castle' is defined there as a 'chess piece which moves backwards, forwards or sideways'. At least Chambers dictionary has 'a rook in chess'.
I wonder what has ever been discussed by the editors of these dictionaries. Perhaps it is correct for them to assume that 'castle' is the popular general perception and to ignore the cries of the chess geeks.
I think The Times uses Collins dictionary so, fair enough, 'castle' is defined there as a 'chess piece which moves backwards, forwards or sideways'. At least Chambers dictionary has 'a rook in chess'.
I wonder what has ever been discussed by the editors of these dictionaries. Perhaps it is correct for them to assume that 'castle' is the popular general perception and to ignore the cries of the chess geeks.
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
It sounds like slopiness to me but then I never do go beyond the OED. They ought to, at least, distinguish between what is colloquial and what is formal.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
I am irretrievably dim at crosswords, so it took me a minute even to backwork this one. I assumed that the word "castle" was important to the clue, since there are castles in Kent. Then it would have been justifiable.
But it isn't important at all, so "Church Mass arranged in heart of Kent bishop for one" would have been equally good. There are as it happens bishops in Kent, if you wish to lead simple solvers such as myself up the garden path.
My conclusion is that there was no advantage in using the term "castle", so it would have been better avoided.
But it isn't important at all, so "Church Mass arranged in heart of Kent bishop for one" would have been equally good. There are as it happens bishops in Kent, if you wish to lead simple solvers such as myself up the garden path.
My conclusion is that there was no advantage in using the term "castle", so it would have been better avoided.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
Somehow Leeds castle is in Kent and not Yorkshire.
-
Paul Habershon
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
A good cryptic crossword clue should read naturally and make sense. Here 'castle' makes sense and 'bishop' doesn't, nor would any of the other chess pieces. Arguably, however, the 'for one' is clumsy and possibly redundant.NickFaulks wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:02 amI am irretrievably dim at crosswords, so it took me a minute even to backwork this one. I assumed that the word "castle" was important to the clue, since there are castles in Kent. Then it would have been justifiable.
But it isn't important at all, so "Church Mass arranged in heart of Kent bishop for one" would have been equally good. There are as it happens bishops in Kent, if you wish to lead simple solvers such as myself up the garden path.
My conclusion is that there was no advantage in using the term "castle", so it would have been better avoided.
-
Joseph Conlon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
Does anyone know how English chess terminology settled on 'rook' for the piece and 'castling' for, well, castling?
-
David Sedgwick
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
- Contact:
Re: Rooks and castles
I don't understand cryptic crosswords at all. but I assumed that you needed the "one" to give you the "e" and the "n" for the solution. If not, from where do they come?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:27 amArguably, however, the 'for one' is clumsy and possibly redundant.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
From the middle of Kent.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 11:25 amI don't understand cryptic crosswords at all. but I assumed that you needed the "one" to give you the "e" and the "n" for the solution. If not, from where do they come?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Joseph Conlon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
To be explicit about the solution for those who have never done crosswords -
Church = CH followed by
EN = 'heart of K(en)t'
which has 'SSMA' ('Mass' arranged, i.e. anagrammatised) inside it, for E(SSMA)N
with the definition 'Castle for one'
apologies to those for whom this is redundant
Church = CH followed by
EN = 'heart of K(en)t'
which has 'SSMA' ('Mass' arranged, i.e. anagrammatised) inside it, for E(SSMA)N
with the definition 'Castle for one'
apologies to those for whom this is redundant
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Rooks and castles
Being devil's advocate, could the compiler have been using "castle" in the sense of "to castle"?
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
But then it's not a chessman.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Rooks and castles
Wikipedia sides with those who dislike "castle":
The rook (/rʊk/; ♖,♜) is a piece in the game of chess resembling a castle. Formerly the piece (from Persian رخ rokh/rukh) was called the tower, marquess, rector, and comes (Sunnucks 1970). The term castle is considered to be informal, incorrect, or old-fashioned.
The rook (/rʊk/; ♖,♜) is a piece in the game of chess resembling a castle. Formerly the piece (from Persian رخ rokh/rukh) was called the tower, marquess, rector, and comes (Sunnucks 1970). The term castle is considered to be informal, incorrect, or old-fashioned.
-
Kevin Thurlow
- Posts: 6632
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
"apologies to those for whom this is redundant"
No need to apologise - couldn't have put it better!
No need to apologise - couldn't have put it better!
-
Paul Habershon
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Rooks and castles
Well spotted! The Collins and Chambers dictionary editors should acknowledge this, especially the 'incorrect' bit. Dictionaries record common usage but they should also have an educational purpose. However, to go off at a tangent, I fear the day will come when 'lay' will replace the 'correct' 'lie', as in something laying/lying in the road or someone having a lay-in instead of a lie-in.Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:18 pmWikipedia sides with those who dislike "castle":
The rook (/rʊk/; ♖,♜) is a piece in the game of chess resembling a castle......The term castle is considered to be informal, incorrect, or old-fashioned.
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Rooks and castles
You could well be ritePaul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:14 pmWell spotted! The Collins and Chambers dictionary editors should acknowledge this, especially the 'incorrect' bit. Dictionaries record common usage but they should also have an educational purpose. However, to go off at a tangent, I fear the day will come when 'lay' will replace the 'correct' 'lie', as in something laying/lying in the road or someone having a lay-in instead of a lie-in.Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:18 pmWikipedia sides with those who dislike "castle":
The rook (/rʊk/; ♖,♜) is a piece in the game of chess resembling a castle......The term castle is considered to be informal, incorrect, or old-fashioned.