Fairer Chess
-
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Twickenham
Fairer Chess
https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/f ... 0Chess.pdf
This paper is referred to in a paywalled article in today's Sunday Times.
The proposal is to make chess fairer by starting WB/BW/WB/WB etc..
I thought today was August 1, not April 1.
What do you think?
This paper is referred to in a paywalled article in today's Sunday Times.
The proposal is to make chess fairer by starting WB/BW/WB/WB etc..
I thought today was August 1, not April 1.
What do you think?
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
It would seem to reduce the complexity of the game by reducing the effectiveness of some traditional openings (e.g. 1. d4 c5 cxd4 seems at least equal for Black whatever White then does). Openings like the Reti appear unchanged.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
I'd like to give it a go in a few casual games.
I used to enjoy the odd game of progressive chess (W plays 1 move, B plays 2 moves, W plays 3 moves, B plays 4 moves etc, I think it may be called 123 chess too) and the variant suggested in the paper looks like a much more restrained version of this. Even so, I suspect that a game would quite quickly become very volatile, which each side making devastating threats which could be replied to with another devastating threat. If this is confirmed in practice, this variant would be more a completely different game than a fairer version of the same game.
Have to admit that I was surprised at the high proportion of white wins in decisive games at the elite level - the paper quotes 64%.
I used to enjoy the odd game of progressive chess (W plays 1 move, B plays 2 moves, W plays 3 moves, B plays 4 moves etc, I think it may be called 123 chess too) and the variant suggested in the paper looks like a much more restrained version of this. Even so, I suspect that a game would quite quickly become very volatile, which each side making devastating threats which could be replied to with another devastating threat. If this is confirmed in practice, this variant would be more a completely different game than a fairer version of the same game.
Have to admit that I was surprised at the high proportion of white wins in decisive games at the elite level - the paper quotes 64%.
-
- Posts: 3562
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Fairer Chess
Not an original idea, see Double Move chess. Invented in 1957, apparently. You might be able to play it online here. That site is blocked for me because it's been classified as a gambling site, so I don't know if it works or not.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
Looks like it has an even older origin than that, under the name Marseillais Chess. That gives the date as between WW1 and 1926. The same site lists other "Double move chess" variants (not to be confused with "Double Chess"!).
Having said that, those variants - unlike "Fairer Chess" - do not start with a single move for White, and some allow king capture rather than standard check/checkmate.
Having said that, those variants - unlike "Fairer Chess" - do not start with a single move for White, and some allow king capture rather than standard check/checkmate.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:55 pm
- Location: Holmfirth
-
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Twickenham
Re: Fairer Chess
This paper isn't proposing Double Move Chess: the idea is that White plays one move, Black plays two moves, White plays two moves, then the game continues with one move at a time, as in normal chess.Colin Purdon wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 11:07 amI'd like to give it a go in a few casual games.
I used to enjoy the odd game of progressive chess (W plays 1 move, B plays 2 moves, W plays 3 moves, B plays 4 moves etc, I think it may be called 123 chess too) and the variant suggested in the paper looks like a much more restrained version of this. Even so, I suspect that a game would quite quickly become very volatile, which each side making devastating threats which could be replied to with another devastating threat. If this is confirmed in practice, this variant would be more a completely different game than a fairer version of the same game.
Have to admit that I was surprised at the high proportion of white wins in decisive games at the elite level - the paper quotes 64%.
-
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Twickenham
Re: Fairer Chess
I agree, both generally and specifically! Others may not, though.Stephen Westmoreland wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 11:44 amI think people need to stop messing with stuff![]()
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
Sorry Richard, you are quite right, my eyes evidently couldn't handle the WB/ notation correctly.
I agree with Stephen Westmoreland and you that this meddling is unnecessary, except as a diversion. However, that could be from the perspective of club level chess and the authors of the paper do make an argument that at elite level and above (computers) the difference in White/Black results is so marked that alternatives should be considered. I don't see that elite chess is broken, so my vote would be to keep it as it is.
I agree with Stephen Westmoreland and you that this meddling is unnecessary, except as a diversion. However, that could be from the perspective of club level chess and the authors of the paper do make an argument that at elite level and above (computers) the difference in White/Black results is so marked that alternatives should be considered. I don't see that elite chess is broken, so my vote would be to keep it as it is.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
As noted earlier it makes no difference if both players start N-KB3, P-KN3, B-N2. On the other hand sequences where an early capture is possible such as the Kings Gambit and Queens Gambit are presumably both ruled out until an engine works out from first principles who it favours.Colin Purdon wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 11:58 amI don't see that elite chess is broken, so my vote would be to keep it as it is.
I think it's understood that Black has sufficient chances in the initial position that were there to be a theoretical solution, the verdict would be draw, but with advantage to White. It follows then that when someone wins it's more likely to be White.
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
Agree with the 'unnecessary at club level' point. In many ways I am pleased not to be a GM. Too much hard work, whereas amateur chess has so many inaccuracies that it doesn't much matter if you are White or Black, you nearly always get your chances. Much more fun.Colin Purdon wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 11:58 am
I agree with Stephen Westmoreland and you that this meddling is unnecessary, except as a diversion. However, that could be from the perspective of club level chess and the authors of the paper do make an argument that at elite level and above (computers) the difference in White/Black results is so marked that alternatives should be considered. I don't see that elite chess is broken, so my vote would be to keep it as it is.
However, I wouldn't support the change at elite level either. Ok, in many tournaments you are going to get one more Black than White, but that's not significant enough for such a major change. Important events like the Candidates are double round anyway. I wonder what the programmers of Fritz et al would make of it?
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Fairer Chess
"I wonder what the programmers of Fritz et al would make of it?"
They would probably see what Stockfish had done?
They would probably see what Stockfish had done?
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:25 am
- Location: origin + pathname + search + hash
Re: Fairer Chess
I wouldn't go anywhere near that site; it doesn't use TLS. [With apologies for being absolutely nothing to do with the topic.]Ian Thompson wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 11:22 amYou might be able to play it online here. That site is blocked for me because it's been classified as a gambling site, so I don't know if it works or not.