Media comments on chess
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Media comments on chess
People are "allowed" to say almost anything.
What some don't like is others objecting to it.
What some don't like is others objecting to it.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Media comments on chess
HEARTBREAK HOTEL on Netflix episode 3
Substantial material about chess, including featuring Gary Lane and his son.
Substantial material about chess, including featuring Gary Lane and his son.
- Chris Goodall
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Media comments on chess
Check out in which paragraphs she's using simple declarative statements, and in which she's saying "girls tend to think"/"I'm just speculating but I wonder whether"/"sometimes women and men tend to"/"I suspect that"/"to put it simplistically"/"some of the girls are probably lacking"/"I need to do more research". Interviewees from the Confuci-o-sphere aren't known for pushing back against interviewers - it's a "face" thing.NickFaulks wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 1:01 pmThanks, I hadn't seen that.Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:56 amhttps://www.chess.com/article/view/hou- ... view-chess
It is a long and thoughtful interview, and she is clear that the paragraph you have plucked out describes just one of a variety of plausible reasons.You will of course continue to make that interpretation, but I can see not a shred of evidence to support it. Her comments are quite clear and well expounded - if she actually believed the opposite, there was no reason for her to have said what she did.(She made some other distinctly hedged comments about emotionality where I think she was just spitballing to avoid saying "no, don't be silly".)
Are you using "fundamental" to mean "biological" there? A lot rests on that.
I think that common argument is a touch idealistic, because when freedom of speech HAS been threatened, it's usually by post hoc objections. When people get up in the morning and decide they're going to crack down on free speech today, they do it by putting consequences in place for saying the wrong thing. Not by, say, shoving a sock in your mouth, which would require a lot of socks.Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 1:03 pmPeople are "allowed" to say almost anything.
What some don't like is others objecting to it.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Media comments on chess
Talking of stereotypes...Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:11 pmInterviewees from the Confuci-o-sphere aren't known for pushing back against interviewers - it's a "face" thing.
Anyway, you can keep doing deep linguistic analysis of her comments to demonstrate that she actually meant the opposite of what she said, I shall continue to take them at face value.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Roland Kensdale
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:15 pm
Re: Media comments on chess
The background to this saga is in the thread International News\Sinquefield Cup 2022.Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 6:56 pmI think this link may work better.Stephen Westmoreland wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 6:15 pmWhat can I say, other than sigh and put my head in my hands. Bless the Mail...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... sport.html
It was someone's joke originally, but whose?
No doubt there are many possible ways to cheat, depending on the level of efforts to defeat the cheating. Unfounded allegations and possible suspicions are major issues.
There's probably a general thread on cheating somewhere.
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Media comments on chess
This was a long one, but there are others.Roland Kensdale wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 6:30 pmThere's probably a general thread on cheating somewhere.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7324
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10473
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Media comments on chess
Just remembered that there's a brief chess sequence in Week-End (1967) directed by Jean-Luc Godard who died a couple of days ago.

(I could have sworn I wrote a blog post on this once, but I'm damned if I can find it.)

(I could have sworn I wrote a blog post on this once, but I'm damned if I can find it.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Media comments on chess
"If Farmer reaches, that's where the chess match begins."
Cincinnati commentator on tonight's Reds @ Cardinals baseball game, meaning that if the player got to first base, the Reds manager might pinch-hit, ie use a substitute for the next batter, and the Cardinals manager might retaliate by bringing in another pitcher.
As it happened, Farmer ground out, ie he put the ball in play but failed to reach first base before an out was recorded.
Cincinnati commentator on tonight's Reds @ Cardinals baseball game, meaning that if the player got to first base, the Reds manager might pinch-hit, ie use a substitute for the next batter, and the Cardinals manager might retaliate by bringing in another pitcher.
As it happened, Farmer ground out, ie he put the ball in play but failed to reach first base before an out was recorded.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Media comments on chess
Grounded out, surely.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Media comments on chess
Apologies for lapsing into the vernacular - I must have had my baseball cap on the wrong way round
-
Paul Habershon
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Media comments on chess
Paul >A rather feeble royal observation tweet:<
Actually the relative power of the queen relative to the king in chess is seldom mentioned.
Just listening to a PEARL BAILEY (a jazz singer) album. The track is called 'I hate men'.
She sings 'I prefer a game of chess'.
Actually the relative power of the queen relative to the king in chess is seldom mentioned.
Just listening to a PEARL BAILEY (a jazz singer) album. The track is called 'I hate men'.
She sings 'I prefer a game of chess'.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10473
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Media comments on chess
Do you know what particular recording that is?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Kevin Thurlow
- Posts: 6631
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Media comments on chess
Justin, Kevin. You have confused me. Are you referring to my note about Pearl Bailey? If so, it came from a collection of her songs on, The Best Of The Roulette Years (CD, Album,
I forgot to remind you all a couple of days ago that 'Pawn Sacrifice' 2014 about the Fischer-Spassky match of 1972 was due to be shown Monday 19.9. on BBC 2 from 11.15 pm. But was it forgetfulness or prescience? It didn't happen because the Queen's Funeral upset all the scheduling.
I forgot to remind you all a couple of days ago that 'Pawn Sacrifice' 2014 about the Fischer-Spassky match of 1972 was due to be shown Monday 19.9. on BBC 2 from 11.15 pm. But was it forgetfulness or prescience? It didn't happen because the Queen's Funeral upset all the scheduling.