Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11371
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Post
by Mick Norris » Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:18 pm
Brian Valentine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:18 pm
Mick Norris wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 2:27 pm
So, if he's not on the ECF rating list, he's not played in a Bolton event then presumably; or was he there in a non-playing capacity?
The Manchester Summer Congress 2023 (at Bolton) was rated, so was Bolton Easter and the Bolton Rapidplay
It's like the premier league transfer window in this part of the world, with rating officers getting submissions in in time for the key 1st September list.
So Mick's post here is already dated, see:
https://rating.englishchess.org.uk/v2/n ... de=370039C. I have no information on whether the Manchester event will be submitted in time. His rating will appear tomorrow.
Hi Brian
My point is that he hasn't played a previous event at Bolton as far as I can see
Chess Results tells us he didn't play at Bolton Arena this month in the Manchester Summer Congress
Hence, at best he has attended in a non playing capacity
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Reg Clucas
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm
Post
by Reg Clucas » Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:55 pm
Mick Norris wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:18 pm
Hence, at best he has attended in a non playing capacity
There was a Mykhailo Shkuro playing in the Open, so possibly a relation.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Post
by NickFaulks » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:08 pm
This is nothing but unsupported allegation. I was asked by FIDE to investigate and found no malfeasance.
GM Golubev was a wonderful attacking player, but weak on logical argument.
Back in the days when he contributed to Alex Baburin's excellent daily broadsheet, he once accused a fellow GM of throwing a game, the sole evidence being that he had lost with White in only 19 moves - something, he wrote, which no honest GM would ever do. Naturally I searched the database for a game which he had lost with White in 19 moves and, on finding one, asked whether he had thrown it. He was incandescent with rage that I would suggest such a thing!
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Jon D'Souza-Eva
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:53 am
Post
by Jon D'Souza-Eva » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:16 pm
NickFaulks wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:08 pm
This is nothing but unsupported allegation. I was asked by FIDE to investigate and found no malfeasance.
The report that Lawrence gave a link to says:
The FIDE Council HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. To cancel or rescind all the ratings for the Rapid and Blitz Chess tournaments in which Mr. Ihor Kobylianskyi (FIDE ID 14106329) participated between October 2018 and January 2020, which said tournaments were previously rated.
2. To cancel or rescind all the ratings for the Blitz Chess tournaments in which Mr. Iuri Shkuro (FIDE ID 14108836) participated between November 2014 and March 2017 which said tournaments were previously rated.
-
Ian Thompson
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Post
by Ian Thompson » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:37 pm
I don't think there's any requirement to achieve a minimum number of norms greater than 1. The requirement is to achieve norms over a minimum of 27 games.
The need for 3 norms just arises from typical tournament lengths not often being sufficient to achieve the minimum number of games in fewer than 3 tournaments.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Post
by NickFaulks » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:51 pm
So far as I could tell, Shkuro's main crime was being Ukrainian in 2019, when this was not a fashionable thing to be within FIDE.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Alex McFarlane
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:52 pm
Post
by Alex McFarlane » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:56 pm
Jon D'Souza-Eva wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:06 pm
Perhaps I'm being dim, but I thought you had to have 3 norms, not 2?
It is normally assumed to be 3 norms as that is the usual way to achieve it but the regulations say 27 games, so two long tournaments would do.
-
Jon D'Souza-Eva
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:53 am
Post
by Jon D'Souza-Eva » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:58 pm
Alex McFarlane wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:56 pm
Jon D'Souza-Eva wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:06 pm
Perhaps I'm being dim, but I thought you had to have 3 norms, not 2?
It is normally assumed to be 3 norms as that is the usual way to achieve it but the regulations say 27 games, so two long tournaments would do.
Thanks Ian and Alex. I've been playing and following chess for over 40 years and I didn't know that!
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Post
by NickFaulks » Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:00 pm
Ian Thompson wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:37 pm
I don't think there's any requirement to achieve a minimum number of norms greater than 1. The requirement is to achieve norms over a minimum of 27 games.
Actually there is.
"1.7 Summary of Requirements for the Number of Opponents
Determining whether a result is adequate for a norm is dependent on the average rating of the opponents. Tables in the Annex show the range for tournaments up to 19 rounds. Norms achieved in a tournament with more than 13 rounds count only as 13 games."
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Post
by NickFaulks » Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:05 pm
Alex McFarlane wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:56 pm
Jon D'Souza-Eva wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:06 pm
Perhaps I'm being dim, but I thought you had to have 3 norms, not 2?
It is normally assumed to be 3 norms as that is the usual way to achieve it but the regulations say 27 games, so two long tournaments would do.
Not any more, see above.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22609
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Post
by Roger de Coverly » Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:42 pm
Earlier in the thread, the accuser comments
At some point I thought about a combination (not necessary, because my position was no worse), but very tempting, it seemed that White’s king would definitely get checkmate or White would lose the material
The opponent had however correctly judged or analysed the position and realised there was no mate. I thought GMs were supposed to be able to spot that kind of thing. Reviewing the game with the lichess Stockfish suggests that both the sacrifice and reply didn't deviate from equality. As pointed out by the opponent, the necessary move was not difficult to find by a process of elimination.
-
IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
-
Contact:
Post
by IM Jack Rudd » Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:51 pm
John Townsend wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 10:27 am
The easy availability of chess computers is adding to both suspicion and, in some cases, actual cheating. A year or two ago, I suggested that use of chess computers, even for private analysis, should be precluded.
Leaving aside the enforceability of this for now, there's another unwanted issue with this one: it would make it impossible to be an active player and an active game-inputter. As someone who is both of these (and, indeed, was doing both jobs at this year's British Championships), I'm going to say this suggestion is a cure that's worse than the disease.
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22609
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Post
by Roger de Coverly » Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:08 am
IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:51 pm
Leaving aside the enforceability of this for now, there's another unwanted issue with this one: it would make it impossible to be an active player and an active game-inputter.
I was trying to recall when Chessbase first started advertising. Was it 1986? Perhaps it took another ten years before the linkage between chess engines and databases was sufficently reliable to enter the mainstream. So that's 1996.
Over the board, you have to remember or calculate correct moves. That's always been the case. For the period of perhaps twenty years between leaving university and having the personal computer to build a database, I felt at a disadvantage when facing players who played in London League, major Congresses or strong county teams, because they would have access to ideas I woudn't know about. That particularly appied to articles on theory advocating moves supposedly giving advantages. where there was a lesser known refutation.