The
BBC article now has a byline (so I should maybe be less critical now that someone is putting their name to this - FWIW, "BBC World News senior journalist and editor in London, prev on Asia and Aus desks"), but the reporting in the BBC article (last updated 32 minutes ago) still makes me wince:
Playing on black, Dommaraju won the game after Ding, who had been in a solid position, made a fatal foolish move that gave up his last powerful piece.
If you are going to report on events like this, just leave out descriptions like that if you don't know how to write about chess (sorry).
Maybe someone should actually point out the numerical error that Ian noticed? "Going into the final game on Thursday, Dommaraju and Ding had eight draws and two wins apiece." - it should be nine draws of course. Made worse by the fact that it then immediately explains the scoring system, allowing readers to work out themselves the error.
To be fair, the rest of the article is good, and should raise interest in the game. So I might stop checking back for 'updates'.