I think you should read what Stewart wrote again. Why would you expect somebody to spend time doing something (for free) that they don't enjoy? There is a difference between saying that the pairing method should be designed for the enjoyment of the arbiters, and respecting the right of an arbiter to not do the job if he doesn't get any enjoyment out of it.Matthew Turner wrote:What an idiot Mr. Croker must be, it is more important for the arbiter to have fun than do the job competently??
The problem is if the arbiters take the decisions on pairing methods and make those decisions for the wrong reasons.