And I had to zoom the screen in 7 times before it could be read comfortably. I think that may have been the point.Michael Jones wrote:Please bear in mind that some people on here may be short-sighted - I needed a magnifying glass to read that!Neill Cooper wrote:I used to teach juniors the 3 ways out of check (take, block, move) until I discovered the fourth when a player thought he was mated as the first 3 did not work.
[The fourth being check your opponent has not made an illegal move.]
Resigning in a legally drawn position
-
Alexander Hardwick
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 4:45 pm
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
-
Neill Cooper
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Contact:
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
Uh, yeah. The fact that formatting options exist is not, in itself, a reason to use them. There are formatting options I'd disable if I could, underline being among them.Neill Cooper wrote:I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
-
Alex Holowczak
- Posts: 9308
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
Awww, don't be such a spoil sport.IM Jack Rudd wrote:Uh, yeah. The fact that formatting options exist is not, in itself, a reason to use them. There are formatting options I'd disable if I could, underline being among them.Neill Cooper wrote:I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
-
Warren Kingston
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
Jack, how about Caps in front of your name
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
I only just came across this ancient string by accident.
What happened in Chandler-Motwani was that neither was dramtically short of time and, what could possibly happen, with two such honourable players? It was tiring (and, in my case, unwise) standing in front of boards, so Kevin O'Connell and I moved from one board to another.
In the brief moment neither of us was present at the board, Murray moved his knight illegally like a bishop, forking king and rook. Murray was already the exchange up and Paul resigned instantly.
Had either Kevin or I been there we would of course have stepped in, hopefully before Paul resigned.
The Appeal Committee asked me what their rights were. I explained that they are very broad. They upheld the resignation, quite correctly, although they could have overturned it It was a relief that Paul stood so much worse.
What happened in Chandler-Motwani was that neither was dramtically short of time and, what could possibly happen, with two such honourable players? It was tiring (and, in my case, unwise) standing in front of boards, so Kevin O'Connell and I moved from one board to another.
In the brief moment neither of us was present at the board, Murray moved his knight illegally like a bishop, forking king and rook. Murray was already the exchange up and Paul resigned instantly.
Had either Kevin or I been there we would of course have stepped in, hopefully before Paul resigned.
The Appeal Committee asked me what their rights were. I explained that they are very broad. They upheld the resignation, quite correctly, although they could have overturned it It was a relief that Paul stood so much worse.
-
David Sedgwick
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
- Contact:
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
Memory can be fickle as to detail after 22 years.Stewart Reuben wrote:In the brief moment neither of us was present at the board, Murray moved his knight illegally like a bishop, forking king and rook. Murray was already the exchange up and Paul resigned instantly.
Here is the game:
Unless I'm much mistaken, Chandler then played 30... Rxf4. Motwani resigned as he would have emerged a rook down after 31. gxf4 Rg8 - except that 30. Nxg7 is check.
-
MSoszynski
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:43 pm
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
Here's my eleventh-ever competitive game. My opponent resigned after the en passant, and quickly exited before anything was queried, so the result stood.
M.Soszynski-J.Cook
Hull Summer League, 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.dxe5 Ne8 6.Qf3+ Kg8 7.Qb3+ d5 8.e5xd6+ (ep) 1-0.
M.Soszynski-J.Cook
Hull Summer League, 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.dxe5 Ne8 6.Qf3+ Kg8 7.Qb3+ d5 8.e5xd6+ (ep) 1-0.
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8661
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
No wonder I get so confused when playing you in simulsMSoszynski wrote:Here's my eleventh-ever competitive game. My opponent resigned after the en passant, and quickly exited before anything was queried, so the result stood.
M.Soszynski-J.Cook
Hull Summer League, 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.dxe5 Ne8 6.Qf3+ Kg8 7.Qb3+ d5 8.e5xd6+ (ep) 1-0.
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position
>No wonder I get so confused when playing you in simuls<
Who givdes the simul?
Who givdes the simul?