Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
surely after Na5 Nxa5 bxa5, Kamsky could have palyed Bxf7+, or arranged some sort of proper attack?! (inserting cxd4 first, so his rook could swing over the third rank would also have made a great difference, it seems to me).
-
Eoin Devane
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
- Location: Cambridge
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Qc4 played. Looks like this one could be going to blitz as well. This match is much more fun to watch than Grischuk - Kramnik.
- Ben Purton
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:53 am
- Location: Berks
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Is there an echo in here Jonathan
!
[i]I love sleep, I need 8 hours a day and about 10 at night[/i] - Bill Hicks
-
Eoin Devane
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
- Location: Cambridge
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Gelfand won, so yet another black win!
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
I assume they mean to say 0-1!
-
LozCooper
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Yes 2-2. Obviously drawing with white at this level isn't as easy as I thought. Maybe a mainline Sicilian isn't the safest choice.
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
well, I think White must have had all sorts of opportunities after Nxa5, so it's more generally a botch-up which could happen regardless of colour (although in this event, apparently only with White ...)
-
David Sedgwick
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
- Contact:
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Indeed so, obviously. As most readers of the Forum will know, you put the Kings on e4 and d5 for a White win, d4 and e5 for a Black win and e4 and e5 for a draw.Jonathan Rogers wrote:I assume they mean to say 0-1!
Tension and fatigue affects arbiters as well as players. It's all too easy to have a momentary aberration and put the Kings temporarily on the wrong squares.
The computer then records the wrong result and the operator has to correct it.
-
John Moore
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Strange isn't it. Maybe you have to play 1d4 to try and make a draw like all these club players have been doing for years.
-
John Moore
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
-
John Moore
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Strange how Kamsky plays 1 d4 and dull stuff in the blitz - surely this was a better choice in game 4
- Ben Purton
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:53 am
- Location: Berks
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Both positions are either =+ or -+ , some of these players are making me want to play Black
[i]I love sleep, I need 8 hours a day and about 10 at night[/i] - Bill Hicks
-
Alex Holowczak
- Posts: 9308
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
What was that rook move from Kramnik? Was there a trick to it, or just a horrible blunder?
-
LozCooper
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Mouse slip?Alex Holowczak wrote:What was that rook move from Kramnik? Was there a trick to it, or just a horrible blunder?
-
LozCooper
Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011
Maybe the armageddon blitz game should be with white getting draw oddsBen Purton wrote:Both positions are either =+ or -+ , some of these players are making me want to play Black