Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

The very latest International round up of English news.
User avatar
Ben Purton
Posts: 1634
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:53 am
Location: Berks

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Ben Purton » Mon May 23, 2011 7:38 pm

Surely hes playing his situation. he is one of the best blitz players in the world, if he can draw out he will. I blame his opponents for being naive enough to fancy their chances in the blitz more than the slower stuff.

Ben
[i]I love sleep, I need 8 hours a day and about 10 at night[/i] - Bill Hicks

LozCooper

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by LozCooper » Mon May 23, 2011 7:46 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:One is (quite literally) infinitely better than zero 8)

I don't know whether to condemn Grischuk, or sneakily admire him for exposing the (not that hard to discern, tbh) limitations of the format that has been used :wink:
I don't blame him for maximising his chances. Realistically, it's the best chance he'll get to win or challenge for the world title so good luck to him. He's not normally known for quick draws and in most tournaments he plays his games out, often with very little time on the clock. If it means that the format won't be used again then he has done us all a favour.

Paul McKeown
Posts: 3828
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Hayes (Middx)

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Paul McKeown » Mon May 23, 2011 9:30 pm

Garbagola. Disappointing.

Mick Norris
Posts: 11367
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Mick Norris » Tue May 24, 2011 12:05 pm

Any postings on here represent my personal views

Mick Norris
Posts: 11367
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Mick Norris » Tue May 24, 2011 12:12 pm

We will see - Gelfand appeared to have gone to sleep for a minute with his head in his hands on the table :lol:

Another QGD, with Grischuk back to playing Bf4, but this time trying c5 and following with Be2 which Shipov says is a novelty
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Phil Neatherway
Posts: 685
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: Abingdon

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Phil Neatherway » Tue May 24, 2011 12:45 pm

I wonder why he preferred Be2 to Bd3. Surely he will move the B to d3 soon anyway.

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Tue May 24, 2011 1:13 pm

Phil Neatherway wrote:I wonder why he preferred Be2 to Bd3. Surely he will move the B to d3 soon anyway.
Why? There's nothing the bishop particularly wants to do on d3, and the ...e5 break black is looking for is surely stronger if ...e4 is a threat as a result.

Phil Neatherway
Posts: 685
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: Abingdon

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Phil Neatherway » Tue May 24, 2011 1:28 pm

Re1 would help to restrain e5 but the Be2 blocks the file.

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Tue May 24, 2011 1:37 pm

Phil Neatherway wrote:Re1 would help to restrain e5 but the Be2 blocks the file.
You may be right; I'd be unsurprised to see that bishop move again soon, but I'd expect it to be to f1.

AustinElliott
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: North of England
Contact:

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by AustinElliott » Tue May 24, 2011 1:46 pm

Shipov suggests Grischuk's play is based on "luring" Black into playing e5, and then perhaps e4, at a time when this allows opening of the position in the centre w advantage to White - especially via a sacrifice on e4, e.g. (after e5--e4) Ne4: de: Bc4 & Re4: w 2 pawns and the initiative for a piece.

Shipov suggests this all looks prepared by Grischuk so far, hence partly why Gelfand declined to play 12..e5 and opted for ...Rf7 (which blocks any checks on the c4-g8 diagonal if the centre is opened) and also allows a possible future ...Nf8 to defend e6. Shipov says 12...e5 13. Rfe1 Kh8! would have been critical, but with the implication that this would likely have been analysed to death by Grischuk's crew. So in Shipov's view 12..Rf7 13 Rae1 are likely the first "non pre-game analysis" moves.

Gelfand now the one to have a long think: he is down below 50 min on the clock

Mick Norris
Posts: 11367
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Mick Norris » Tue May 24, 2011 1:48 pm

Gelfand has played Nf8 - he has 47 mins for 27 moves, Grischuk has 83 mins
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Simon Ansell
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Simon Ansell » Tue May 24, 2011 1:51 pm

Gelfand seems to have given up on the ...e5 plan but if Black can't get this in it seems to me White is just better. Some plan involving Bd3, h4-h5 and a kingside attack looks quite attractive, I don't see where Black's counterplay is coming from.

Mick Norris
Posts: 11367
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Mick Norris » Tue May 24, 2011 1:54 pm

Shipov agrees that White is better and Grischuk has played Bd3
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Phil Neatherway
Posts: 685
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: Abingdon

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by Phil Neatherway » Tue May 24, 2011 1:55 pm

I knew he would! :)

AustinElliott
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: North of England
Contact:

Re: Candidates Matches 3rd - 27th May 2011

Post by AustinElliott » Tue May 24, 2011 1:56 pm

And 13... Nf8

So it looks like Gelfand is settling for solid "massed strong point" defence after rejecting the break with ..e5.

Apart from sacrifices on e4, Shipov also highlighted the idea of White N sacrifices on d5 (after 13 ...e5 14 de: fe: with 15. Nd5: cd: 16. Qd5: - which perhaps might be one reason the White KB went to e2 rather than d3, if that's not too far-fetched.

Wonder if the B will go to d3 now to allow White to double Rs on the K-file?

Gelfand doesn't seem to have many avenues of counterplay in this position. Shipov says ...a5 was possible in some earlier lines, (e.g. if the f-Rook had gone to e1 rather than the a-Rook)... but a5 looks out now as White could reply b5-b6 squeezing Black even further.

Update: yes - White plays Bd3

Post Reply