Well, he did say "play". And he was also quoted in a Guardian piece of a couple of months ago as saying: "Around 500 million people in 167 countries play the game and only football can rival that".John McKenna wrote:Justin Horton>"approx. 500 million people play (chess) globally" (Malcolm Pein). Really?<
Maybe he meant that many know the moves or have played a casual game...
Anand v Gelfand
-
Angus French
- Posts: 2199
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Anand v Gelfand
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Anand v Gelfand
I don't think it's disputed that FIDE has a global reach, second only to FIFA. How many play to a reasonable standard remains an issue.Angus French wrote: 167 countries play the game and only football can rival that.
-
John McKenna
Re: Anand v Gelfand
I'd say 1700 is some kind of minimum reasonable standard. (Whether I play to that standard is an issue between me and myself on the day.)
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6321
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Au contraire, "reasonable standard" in this context - IMO anyway - means knowing just enough to not just be randomly shifting bits around.......
That is, almost everybody who plays at a club and quite a few who don't. Even on this interpretation, shurely not 500 million though??
That is, almost everybody who plays at a club and quite a few who don't. Even on this interpretation, shurely not 500 million though??
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Graham Borrowdale
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Third game underway: another Grunfeld with 3f3. Anand has opened the h-file and castled long.
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
The Truran systemGraham Borrowdale wrote:Third game underway: another Grunfeld with 3f3. Anand has opened the h-file and castled long.
If this one peters out in 25 moves, I'll be very surprised
-
Graham Borrowdale
Re: Anand v Gelfand
It looks very risky for white, especially after black's e4, but I am sure Anand knows what he is doing ?
If one side is not mated by move 25 it could still peter out...
If one side is not mated by move 25 it could still peter out...
-
John McKenna
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Are we reaching the point of no return (to the draw) - 23.d6 Rc5, and it's the active pieces of Boris v. the extra (passed) pawn of Vishy. Boris gave a slight shake of the head - is he alright?
-
John McKenna
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Anand is playing like 'Der Kaiser' (Franz Beckenbauer) - deep defence with a lone striker way up the field!
-
Matthew Turner
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Anand v Gelfand
At chessdom they seem very negative about Gelfand's play, but it seems to me that he is playing very actively and it is tricky for Anand to untangle his pieces.
-
Matthew Turner
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Anand v Gelfand
I might just see a draw 27...Nd3 28 Nd4 Nb4! 29. Nxc2 Rxc2 30 Rb2 Rc1 31. Rb1 etc. I guess White cannot be better after 30 Rxb4
-
Paul Cooksey
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Illescas and Har-zvi very complimentary about the standard of play on ICC. They thought white could escape Matthew's nice line with Re1 and running away, disappointingly.
Speelman just kibitzed a way to win a double rook ending with d8=N check.
Speelman just kibitzed a way to win a double rook ending with d8=N check.
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Seems to be heading for a draw, now, perhaps? Double rooks are always dangerous, though.
-
Paul McKeown
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Can you give us the variation, Paul, please?Speelman just kibitzed a way to win a double rook ending with d8=N check.
-
Matthew Turner
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Anand v Gelfand
Paul (Cooksey),
Not sure if Re1 works, just Bf5
Not sure if Re1 works, just Bf5