Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Malcolm Clarke wrote:I believe the Mike that Dominique mentions as passing on is in fact Michael Crewdson. I received an email from Mike Wills two weeks ago, and he has also a facebook page.
I was sent an e-mail from Ray Cannon pointing this out as well. That e-mail included the following from Mike Wills:
"I have vivid (and very pleasant) memories of the 1972 Karpov simul which George Szaszvari refers to. (Indeed I have masses of vivid and very pleasant memories of the London CentYMCA Chess Club and its members)." (Mike Wills)
Ray also pointed out that the Bd5 bit should be corrected as follows:
"It was after 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Bg5 Nbd7 7 Bc4 Qa5 8 Qd2 b5? and only then 9 Bd5! that I used to like demonstrating the various advantageous lines of play. This is noted in the first Bayswater Weekend Tournament bulletin way back more than 40 years ago." (Ray Cannon)
We now return you to your normal programming.
Aaaarrr, forrrty yeeearrs ago....aaaaarrrr! You crinkly old codger, you!
Seriously, though, Ray's line is another variant that happened in a game between Yugoslavs that was found in most
opening books of the time. Ray showed me quite a few nuances like this one back in those days, and, iirc we also
looked at 8...e6 9.0-0-0 b5! 10.Bd5 exd5 11.exd with white on the attack. Wasn't there a Tal-Matanovic game in
which black successfully defended a similar position, if not this one? But as previously stated 10...b4 is best after
8...e6 9.0-0-0 b5 10.Bd5. [Note that if 9.0-0 black shouldn't play 9...b5? look up Korchnoi's games; he played these
positions really well] I suspect many players tried 10.Bd5 because the maneuver was widely published as the refutation
of 8...b5? and does look pretty plausible even a move later. In one of my feeble attempts to qualify for the British
Championship when players had to make their own arrangements on when and where to play (I did this for a couple
of years and then stuck to playing in the annual British Ch Major Open whenever I could) I was paired with a young
Jonathon Kinlay in 1972 who turned up for our game at YMCA one evening in his Dulwich College blazer and iirc promptly
went down this whole line (Kinlay white) after 8.Qd2 e6 9.0-0-0 b5 10.Bd5 b4 11.Bxa8 bxc3 12.bxc3 Nb6 13.Bc6+??
Bd7 14.Bxd7+ Kxd7 15.Nb3?? Qa3+ 16.Kb1 Na4 and it's all over. Obviously white blundered at the critical points. Charles
de Villiers tried to prove that 12...Nc5 was better than ...Nb6 but I can't recall whether we came to any conclusion
about that. I had the pleasure of meeting up again socially with Jonathon Kinlay years later after he gained his IM title
and had more or less retired from competitive chess.